This lets users tell OpenOCD which non-standard CSRs exist on their
target, that will also be accessible and whose existence will be
communicated to gdb.
Change-Id: I56163a9fcb84ad7ebe815ae74fbd9fcc208f5a9d
(It's really only 2 bits, but something wonky happens between gdb and
OpenOCD if I make it that size.)
Change-Id: I562a65cb0ebe5aa0edcc54c251d0fea0e26f9cb1
Events reset-halt-pre, reset-halt-post, reset-wait-pre and
reset-wait-post are not used anywhere.
Change-Id: I9a0f94875b102d9b08f6c2fd9d73a9f05f8e8e79
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4285
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
New STM8 target based mostly on mips4k. Target communication
through STLINK/SWIM. No flash driver yet but it is still possible
to program flash through load_image command. The usual target debug
methods are implemented.
Change-Id: I7216f231d3ac7c70cae20f1cd8463c2ed864a329
Signed-off-by: Ake Rehnman <ake.rehnman@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3953
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ieea1b0dec88818e9e8d5c8c5d54aa8959556d77b
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <openocd-dev@marcschink.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4275
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Because there is no instruction that moves just half of a 64-bit FPR
to/from a GPR, we need to use scratch memory for this operation. This
code can theoretically use:
1. DMI_DATA, if it is memory mapped in the target.
2. DMI_PROGBUF, if it is writable in the target.
3. A user-configured address.
I have only tested this code very lightly. One reason is that gdb thinks
that on RV32 harts every register is 32 bits wide. Another is that this
is mostly proof-of-concept to satisfy the small program buffer code
review, which I don't want to drag out forever.
Existing tests don't realize that floating support was broken with
RV32D, and don't realize that it still doesn't work because of the gdb
problem mentioned above.
This change improves Issue #110 but there's more work to be done.
Change-Id: I99b8a36e5fea26f1d9e16e36cf99adc7be26b944
The dhcsr_save variable was used to save the value of
cortex_m->dcb_dhcsr so it could be restored later. However, all writes
in between the save and the restore use mem_ap_write_atomic_u32, not
cortex_m_write_debug_halt_mask, which means cortex_m->dcb_dhcsr isn’t
changed anyway. Delete the unnecessary local.
Change-Id: I064a3134e21398e1ecfc9f1fa7efd7b020b52341
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4240
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
In cortex_m_assert_reset, in two locations, DHCSR is written directly
using mem_ap_write_u32. This means that the cached version,
target_to_cm(target)->dcb_dhcsr, is not updated when these writes are
performed, so subsequent writes to DHCSR that use
cortex_m_write_debug_halt_mask will change those bits back to their old
values which, unless modified in that particular invocation, come from
the cache. This causes an actual, observable bug on an STM32F7 in which
running “reset run” immediately after “program” can in some cases result
in execution proceeding with C_MASKINTS set (it is cleared on line 1021
but is then set immediately afterward in cortex_m_clear_halt), causing
failure of the application. Replace these mem_ap_write_u32 calls with
cortex_m_write_debug_halt_mask calls to do the same jobs.
Change-Id: Id35ca7f6057c2df2ba9cd67c53a73b50816d0b71
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4239
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
GCC7 with -Wall warns about possible string truncation with
snprint()-type functions with "directive output may be truncated writing
1 byte into a region of size between 0 and 9
[-Werror=format-truncation=]" + "note: ‘snprintf’ output between 5 and
14 bytes into a destination of size 12" (or similar). Fix this by
increasing sizes of buffers.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
Change-Id: Ib848f2a56dd658783534158947ae1be7c0e99d45
Signed-off-by: Freddie Chopin <freddie.chopin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4175
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
GCC7 with -Wextra warns about switch-case blocks which fallthrough with
"this statement may fall through [-Werror=implicit-fallthrough=]". This
can be fixed by adding "special" comments: "/* fallthrough */".
See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-7/changes.html
Change-Id: Iba0be791dbdd86984489b2d9a0592bb59828da1e
Signed-off-by: Freddie Chopin <freddie.chopin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4174
Tested-by: jenkins
Add "arm semihosting_cmdline [argv0 argv1 ...]" for setting the
command line arguments for the debuggee.
[andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com]: Dynamic allocation, empty default
Change-Id: I831ddd161d602f251940e29608a154e9590fdee1
Signed-off-by: Christian Groessler <chris@groessler.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3106
Tested-by: jenkins
They're never used, so just drop them.
Change-Id: Ie137deed3e7258f9d6af7e0cb508e73df0f53ee0
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@tweak.net.au>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4131
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Previously it might read an address multiple times if an abstract
command took longer to execute than expected.
The new implementations reads from the target how far it has gotten
along reading memory, and resumes from there if cmderr=busy.
This ended up being a bigger change than I envisioned, but in the end it
deleted more lines than it added, so I'm happy. :-)
The downloaded program now post-increments, and there's no longer an
attempt to read the current address from the target. This made it easier
to fix the problem where at the start of the loop the current address
was already read (in regular entry) or has not yet been read (when the
first round through the loop encountered busy more than once, or busy
was encountered at least once later on).
The interesting new code concerns ignore_prev_addr and
this_is_last_read.
Additionally, I tweaked some debug output, and optimized
riscv_batch_run() when the batch is empty.
The actual implementation of triggers didn't change between those two
versions, so there's no need to duplicate the code.
In the process, I also fixed a minor multicore bug where tselect didn't
always get written on all harts.
This is the only way the spec guarantees that GPRs are accessible, and
depending on the implementation this might be the only way that CSRs are
accessible.
Also changed the debug code that parses out DMI fields to be simpler to
maintain (albeit a little slower).
riscv013_execute_debug_buffer() now automatically clears cmderr if the
command fails. That feels like the right behavior. (It does return the
error to its caller.)
When first connecting to a target, have the debugger disable any
hardware triggers that are set by a previously connected debugger.
The 0.11 code already did this, but 0.13 did not.
To achieve this I decided to share the code to enumerate triggers
between 0.11 and 0.13, which required me to implement get_register() and
set_register() for 0.11, which made the whole change a lot larger than
you might have guessed.
Hopefully this sets us up to in the future share the code to set/remove
triggers as well.
They were implemented, and people want to keep using them.
Also make OpenOCD tolerate cores that have $misa at 0xf10 instead of the
current address of 0x301.
Actually return an error when we fail to read a CSR.
Tweak cache_set32() debug output.
Commit 47b8cf842 changed the fixed type of the value argument to snprint
but didn't change the format string to match for sizes != 64 bit.
Change-Id: I908b06f49ab69d04224282949190a0de883048e0
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4167
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Stian Skjelstad <stian@nixia.no>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Guehring <pg@futureware.at>
Now that we're supporting non-RTOS multi-hart mode there's some more
assertions that you're running on the right hart. Those assertions
aren't sane very early in examine, so I avoid them.
Rather than having a bunch of "if rtos" stuff, I now just check "if
hart_enabled". This makes some code paths cleaner, all of which were
buggy in the non-RTOS multi-hart mode.