Don't use 'extern' in a C file, but declare the exported function
in a H file.
This helps validating the function prototype across declaration
and use.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I2c22b084fb513f4b3b1b1db96dfbc8fa4bfe7238
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7666
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a jtag
driver, that the struct adapter_driver is declared in the file as
non static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of adapter_driver's declaration in interface.h
Drop the preprocessor #ifdef/#endif around the declaration, as it
has no effect when the declaration is not used and/or the symbol
does not exist.
Change-Id: I5b8f5fe48a89ff0ffce38d547c551cd196379fbf
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7665
Tested-by: jenkins
Let source files to include its file .h to validate the exported
prototypes.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I217c2903fdb19e1a2cce39d2536a903c3d72f3f7
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7664
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a pld
driver, that the struct pld_driver is declared in the file as
non static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of pld_driver's declaration in pld.h
Change-Id: I0f917aecc7534c1b51af0afa9b32ccfd33db3511
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7663
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a nor
driver, that the struct flash_driver is declared in the file as
non static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of flash_driver's declaration in driver.h
Fix some incorrect non-const declaration and remove redundant
forward declarations.
Change-Id: I5e41d094307aac4a57dfa9a70496ff3cf180bd92
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7662
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a nand
driver, that the struct nand_flash_controller is declared in the
file as non static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of nand_flash_controller's declaration in driver.h
While there, drop the unused/commented boundary scan controller.
Change-Id: I7dc32cef55be13ba537abe0f4c47b135d837126c
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7661
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a rtos'
file, that the struct rtos_type is declared in the file as non
static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of rtos_type's declaration in rtos.h
Change-Id: Ia96dff077407a6653b11920519c1724e4c1167a3
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7660
Tested-by: jenkins
The static analyser 'sparse' complains, while compiling a target's
file, that the struct target_type is declared in the file as non
static, but it is not exposed through an include file.
The message is:
warning: symbol 'XXX' was not declared. Should it be static?
Move the list of target_type's declaration in target_type.h
While there, fix a name clash in stm8.c
Change-Id: Ia9c681e0825cfd04d509616dbc04a0cf4944f379
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7659
Tested-by: jenkins
In case in the future I have the same idea of optimizing progbuf writes
again.
Change-Id: Ie383487691cceeff75e2c22f4c85fc1fe4873937
Signed-off-by: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com>
Small cleanup in target.c to get rid of few upstream differences:
- removed a pointless check for `reg->exists` - already checked
few lines above
- unify one log message with what's in upstream
Change-Id: I3fd761157382670611fa90de84e2dfc90192f473
Signed-off-by: Jan Matyas <jan.matyas@codasip.com>
Non-functional change: unused function removed that does not exist
in the OpenOCD upstream, either.
Change-Id: Ibeab5b41a24183673cc02ca919b2f7285309e6f4
Signed-off-by: Jan Matyas <jan.matyas@codasip.com>
To perform any meaningful manipulations with DR the corresponding IR should
be set to a relevant instruction, not BYPASS, so warn the user accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I42580ecd75ae824a4145f6f17f0df9bcf825b50f
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7654
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Tested-by: jenkins
It's customary to use [] brackets to mean the argument is optional, but
drscan requires at least one pair of "num_bits value" so change it to ().
In common regular expressions * means 0 or more, and + means 1 or more,
so change that too.
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ib15d833bda2aa398ad1345a042f97d91c98dbf66
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7653
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
While there, add the missing .usage field and move in target.c the
enum nvp_assert.
Change-Id: Ia4f2f962887b5a35faeaa4eae128fa2865569b24
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7559
Tested-by: jenkins
Reorganize the code to parse the command line only once.
Add check for successful memory allocation.
Change-Id: Ibf6068e177c09e93150d11aecfcf079348c47c21
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7555
Tested-by: jenkins
For some trivial case only, replace calls to jim-nvp with calls
to the new OpenOCD nvp.
Change-Id: Ifd9aff32b67748af8ab808e6a6b6e64f5271b888
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7553
Tested-by: jenkins
New gcc does not understand that the variable 'restore_ms' is set
to 'true' only when the variable 'ms' is assigned in
static int xtensa_write_dirty_registers(...)
{
xtensa_reg_val_t ms;
bool restore_ms = false;
...
if (...) {
ms = regval;
restore_ms = true;
...
}
...
if (restore_ms) {
USE(ms);
}
...
}
and complains about possible use of uninitialized variable 'ms'.
Sadly initialize 'ms' to zero to hide this false positive.
Change-Id: I1fb3949070c8abbf4aa45a740f0ca2fdb753d4fa
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7681
Reviewed-by: Erhan Kurubas <erhan.kurubas@espressif.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Thompson <ianst@cadence.com>
Tested-by: jenkins
Current code tests a function pointer against a numeric value that
is the same enum type as returned by the pointed function.
Clearly the author was willing to call the function and check its
returned value.
Fix the check by calling the function.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I27d18d26c2c797160a397daa32835c199014b70b
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Checkpatch-ignore: GIT_COMMIT_ID
Fixes: 237e894805 ("reworked etm/etb into a generic etm part with trace capture")
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7599
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Commit 07e1ebcc12 ("jtag: drivers: with pointers, use NULL
instead of 0") incorrectly inverts the check, making the driver's
pathmove operation not functional and triggering two clang errors.
Fix the check on malloc() returned pointer.
Change-Id: If1f220aca67452adbcd3a1c9cf691fc984b16b27
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Fixes: 07e1ebcc12 ("jtag: drivers: with pointers, use NULL instead of 0")
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7656
Tested-by: jenkins
When gatemate_set_instr() fails, the array pointed by
bit_file.raw_file.data is not freed.
Issue identified by OpenOCD Jenkins clang build.
Free the array while propagating the error.
Change-Id: I2f7fadee903f9c65cdc9ab9b52ccb5803b48a59d
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Fixes: 682f927f8e ("pld: add support for cologne chip gatemate fpgas")
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7632
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Daniel Anselmi <danselmi@gmx.ch>
Let source file to include its file .h to validate the exported
prototypes.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I8ae2f8f1fdaea5683e157247463533b17237e464
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7602
Tested-by: jenkins
On 32 bit hosts, gcc should consider constants without suffix as
32 bits values.
Use the suffix 'ULL' to guarantee it is a 64 bit.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I205ca986968fef9a536f87492d1f6c80e41829f3
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7601
Tested-by: jenkins
Don't compare pointers with 0, use NULL when needed.
Don't assign pointer to 0, use NULL.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: Ifa81ba961c0d490cc74880b4a46b620e6358f779
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7598
Tested-by: jenkins
Don't compare pointers with 0, use NULL when needed.
Don't assign pointer to 0, use NULL.
Don't pass 0 ad pointer argument, pass NULL.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I3f867cb9c0903f6e396311e7b3970ee5fb3a4231
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7597
Tested-by: jenkins
Let source file to include its file .h to validate the exported
prototypes.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I5de107b4f8a468f0e37f06171f5f0c3c0546db1a
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7596
Tested-by: jenkins
Add static type to symbols that are not used elsewhere.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I2bdac5d2b06a6dbed5c27bfdb1cf36eee90ad823
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7594
Tested-by: jenkins
On 32 bit hosts, gcc should consider constants without suffix as
32 bits values. Adding a cast to convert it to 64 bits should not
be enough.
Use the suffix 'ULL' to guarantee it is a 64 bit.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: If6be35bd3cbbc7c3a83e0da1407e611f07ff6e06
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7593
Tested-by: jenkins
Don't compare pointers with 0, use NULL when needed.
Don't assign pointer to 0, use NULL.
Don't pass 0 ad pointer argument, pass NULL.
While there, check for return value from malloc(), replace an
assert() with a LOG_ERROR(), drop a useless cast.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: Ia7cf52221b12198aba1a07ebdfaf57ce341d5699
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7592
Tested-by: jenkins
Add static type to symbols that are not used elsewhere.
Detected through 'sparse' tool.
Change-Id: I00e151d2466868a5dce028444d326defb80d4826
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7591
Tested-by: jenkins
It looks like a false positive.
Scan-build considers as possible to:
- have list_empty() return false;
- list_for_each_safe() to not execute any loop, thus not assigning
a non-NULL value to 'block';
- the NULL pointer 'block' is passed to list_del().
This is not possible because with list_empty(), the loop runs at
least once.
Rewrite the function to simplify the code and making it easier for
scan-build to check it.
This also drops an incorrect use of list_for_each_safe(), where
the 'safe' version was not required.
Change-Id: Ia8b1d221cf9df73db1196e3f51986023dcaf78eb
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Fixes: 8d1dcf293a ("target/espressif: add application tracing functionality over JTAG")
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7608
Reviewed-by: Erhan Kurubas <erhan.kurubas@espressif.com>
Tested-by: jenkins