It's a repeating pattern to print an error message tied to an AST
node. Start using an 'input_error' helper for that. Among other
things this is beneficial in shortening the print lines, which tend
to be long.
Distinguish between the A, B input ports of `$_ANDNOT_`, `$_ORNOT_`
gates when considering those for sharing. Unlike the input ports of the
other supported single-bit gates, those are not interchangeable.
Fixes#3848.
Python 3.12 emits a SyntaxWarning when encountering invalid escape
sequences. They still parse as expected. Marking these raw produces
the same result without the warnings.
An `std::vector<T>::reverse_iterator` stores the
`std::vector<T>::iterator` which points to the (forwards-ordered)
*following* item. Thus while `vec.rbegin()` dereferences to the final
item of `vec`, the iterator it wraps (`vec.rbegin().base()`) is equal to
`vec.end()`.
In the remove case here, we advance `it` (backwards), erasing the item
we just advanced past by grabbing its (pre-increment) base
forward-iterator and subtracting 1.
The iterator maths here is obviously all OK, but the forward-iterator
that `it` wraps post-increment actually points to the item we just
removed. That iterator was invalidated by the `erase()` call.
That this works anyway is (AFAICT) some combination of luck and/or
promises that aren't part of the C++ spec, but MSVC's debug iterator
support picks this up.
`erase()` returns the new iterator that follows the item just erased,
which happens to be the exact one we want our reverse-iterator to wrap
for the next loop; we get a fresh iterator to the same base, now without
the preceding item.
Move additional notes up to the top and give it its own section. Also reformat some paragraphs, and turn some bullet points into paragraphs.
Split supported patterns section into some kind of grouping.
Currently:
- SDP
- single-port RAM
- reset patterns
- asymmetric
- TDP