for non_cfi cfi chips free() was invoked on rodata.
The mystery is why this bug has survived for so long.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
sizeof() is a bit less scary than seing assumption
about size of type, no bug as such.
Use NULL instead of 0 for pointers. More obvious that
it is a pointer from code inspection.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Someone called David Carne popped up on IRC and offered a fix (as he's not
on this list so can;t post here). I am just passing it on. (thanx David)
10:54 < davidc__> Basically; the Numonyx M29W160ET has an incorrect CFI PRI
block; it describes the erase blocks backwards
10:54 < davidc__> the linked patch has a fixup for that part [really trivial]:
The patch improves flash erase for STR9x in case of a full bank erase.
Then the chip erase command is used instead which improves speed significantly.
Also I think it might help if e.g. STR912 enters some state where flash banks are locked, and a chip erase command is the key for unlocking the flash.
This flash driver works on more than just two chips.
(Though it does need work still, e.g. to protect more than 64K.
(On non-'3748-A0 chips where errata allow that.))
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
For the above targets the exit_point is
optional when used with run_algorithm, so remove it.
This makes updating the algorithm less error prone.
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver <ntfreak@users.sourceforge.net>
This adds a nand driver support for the nuc910 target.
Note that ECC is not currently supported by this driver, although
it is supported by the peripheral.
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver <ntfreak@users.sourceforge.net>
Review allocation of error numbers in openocd
to avoid overlap.
Put brackets around negative numbers to avoid
issues during macro expansion.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Add "static" qualifier to private functions.
Move duplicated global declarations from "target/avrt.c"
and "nor/avrf.c" to "target/avrt.h".
Remove unused declarations form "nor/avrf.c".
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Helper ./src/helper/membuf.c is only used in at91sam3.c
1) Replace membuf with LOG_*
2) The original code in sam3_GetDetails() invalidates
all the buffered output of sam3_GetInfo(). The new
code skips sam3_GetInfo() if its output should not
be printed.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
when the verify failed, it didn't return an error,
which breaks e.g. tcl scripts that rely on this for
exceptions to work.
Found by -Wshadow
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
found by code inspection. There are many other places in
CFI where LOG_ERROR() should be called similarly...
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
when a write/unlock/erase failed during write_image, then
an error was not propagated back up so e.g. flash write
image from tcl scripts would not throw an exception.
Also flash filling speed was printed even when the
operation failed. Output is now less confusing.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
any read/write operation to memory can fail.
block write algorithm error propagation was broken
in that it would continue after an error was reported
writing data to ram or the algorithm failing.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Hello,
"stm32x mass_erase" return ERROR_OK even if something goes wrong.
Here is a summary of changes :
* in stm32x_mass_erase : return ERROR_FLASH_OPERATION_FAILED when error
detected in FLASH_SR register;
* in COMMAND_HANDLER(stm32x_handle_mass_erase_command) : return the
returned value of stm32x_mass_erase().
I don't know if there is reason to always return ERROR_OK ?
Gaëtan
Øyvind Harboe
Flemming Futtrup
Wookey
Spencer Oliver
Fredrik Hederstierna
David Brownell
Olaf Lüke
Antonio Borneo
Edgar Grimberg
gcembed