str9x: faster flash erase of entire chip
The patch improves flash erase for STR9x in case of a full bank erase. Then the chip erase command is used instead which improves speed significantly. Also I think it might help if e.g. STR912 enters some state where flash banks are locked, and a chip erase command is the key for unlocking the flash.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8f779cf66b
commit
a8c8c238f2
|
@ -223,6 +223,7 @@ static int str9x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
|||
uint32_t adr;
|
||||
uint8_t status;
|
||||
uint8_t erase_cmd;
|
||||
int total_timeout;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bank->target->state != TARGET_HALTED)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -230,16 +231,27 @@ static int str9x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
|||
return ERROR_TARGET_NOT_HALTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*A slower but stable way of erasing*/
|
||||
/* Erase sector command */
|
||||
erase_cmd = 0x20;
|
||||
/* Check if we can erase whole bank */
|
||||
if ((first == 0) && (last == (bank->num_sectors - 1)))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Optimize to run erase bank command instead of sector */
|
||||
erase_cmd = 0x80;
|
||||
/* Add timeout duration since erase bank takes more time */
|
||||
total_timeout = 1000 * bank->num_sectors;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Erase sector command */
|
||||
erase_cmd = 0x20;
|
||||
total_timeout = 1000;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = first; i <= last; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval;
|
||||
adr = bank->base + bank->sectors[i].offset;
|
||||
|
||||
/* erase sectors */
|
||||
/* erase sectors or block */
|
||||
if ((retval = target_write_u16(target, adr, erase_cmd)) != ERROR_OK)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
|
@ -256,7 +268,8 @@ static int str9x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int timeout;
|
||||
for (timeout = 0; timeout < 1000; timeout++) {
|
||||
for (timeout = 0; timeout < total_timeout; timeout++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if ((retval = target_read_u8(target, adr, &status)) != ERROR_OK)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
|
@ -265,7 +278,7 @@ static int str9x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
|||
break;
|
||||
alive_sleep(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (timeout == 1000)
|
||||
if (timeout == total_timeout)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LOG_ERROR("erase timed out");
|
||||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
|
@ -288,6 +301,10 @@ static int str9x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
|||
LOG_ERROR("error erasing flash bank, status: 0x%x", status);
|
||||
return ERROR_FLASH_OPERATION_FAILED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we ran erase bank command, we are finished */
|
||||
if (erase_cmd == 0x80)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = first; i <= last; i++)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue