This partially reverts commit 56d163ce79.
That change certainly caused more pain than gain.
Change-Id: Ifb126abd1e6b89d29db8bf6a7b8af5dfc815c163
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4159
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@tweak.net.au>
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
A common use case seen in the wild is echoing a string of commands to an
existing openocd instance via netcat. The sequence of ; separated
commands can easily run over the line limit of only 256 chars.
Increasing this dramatically reduces surprises, at the expense of a tiny
amount of extra ram usage.
Change-Id: I2389d99d316a96b5fa03f0894b43c412308e12c4
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@tweak.net.au>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4132
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
They're never used, so just drop them.
Change-Id: Ie137deed3e7258f9d6af7e0cb508e73df0f53ee0
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@tweak.net.au>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4131
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Previously it might read an address multiple times if an abstract
command took longer to execute than expected.
The new implementations reads from the target how far it has gotten
along reading memory, and resumes from there if cmderr=busy.
This ended up being a bigger change than I envisioned, but in the end it
deleted more lines than it added, so I'm happy. :-)
The downloaded program now post-increments, and there's no longer an
attempt to read the current address from the target. This made it easier
to fix the problem where at the start of the loop the current address
was already read (in regular entry) or has not yet been read (when the
first round through the loop encountered busy more than once, or busy
was encountered at least once later on).
Paul Fertser
Karl Palsson
Liviu Ionescu
Tim Newsome
Palmer Dabbelt