if polling is off, then "reset run + halt" would fail
since halt incorrectly assumed the target was in the
reset state as it is the internal poll implementation
that moves the sw tracking of the target state out
of the reset state.
To reproduce:
> reset run; halt
JTAG tap: zy1000.cpu tap/device found: 0x1f0f0f0f (mfg: 0x787, part: 0xf0f0, ver: 0x1)
BUG: arm7/9 does not support halt during reset. This is handled in arm7_9_assert_reset()
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
This second half of the patch is proposed to clean up some GDB keep alive
issues on arm7_9 targets that start up with very slow clocks. If an attempt
is made to write to key registers on the processor with a slow jtag speed,
GDB timeout warnings appear on the console (at least mine) when "reset halt"
or "reset init" commands are issued from the gdb client:
*** BEFORE PATCH ***
(gdb) monitor reset init
fast memory access is disabled
2 kHz
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1026). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
JTAG tap: at91sam9g20.cpu tap/device found: 0x0792603f (mfg: 0x01f, part:
0x7926, ver: 0x0)
target state: halted
target halted in ARM state due to breakpoint, current mode: Supervisor
cpsr: 0x000000d3 pc: 0x00000000
MMU: disabled, D-Cache: disabled, I-Cache: disabled
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1027). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1006). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1006). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1006). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
keep_alive() was not invoked in the 1000ms timelimit. GDB alive packet not
sent! (1004). Workaround: increase "set remotetimeout" in GDB
RCLK - adaptive
dcc downloads are enabled
fast memory access is enabled
NAND flash device 'NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit' found
(gdb)
I added additional keep alive steps in areas that troubleshooting revealed
were causing problems. I only did this however for non-fast write memory
accesses. I don't think most people would be using fast memory accesses to
write to memory when the jtag and system clocks are slow anyway.
If you disagree with my feeling, think there is a more elegant way to handle
the problem, or think the patch will cause other unforeseen problems with
other targets, let me know. As you can see below, the patch does eliminate
the problem on my development station and I suspect that it will benefit
others.
*** AFTER PATCH ***
(gdb) monitor reset init
fast memory access is disabled
2 kHz
JTAG tap: at91sam9g20.cpu tap/device found: 0x0792603f (mfg: 0x01f, part:
0x7926, ver: 0x0)
target state: halted
target halted in ARM state due to breakpoint, current mode: Supervisor
cpsr: 0x000000d3 pc: 0x00000000
MMU: disabled, D-Cache: disabled, I-Cache: disabled
RCLK - adaptive
dcc downloads are enabled
fast memory access is enabled
NAND flash device 'NAND 256MiB 3,3V 8-bit' found
(gdb)
Gary Carlson
Gary Carlson, MSEE
Principal Engineer
Carlson-Minot Inc.
By a bit of code inspection it seems like all of these
instances of jtag_get_end_state() can be unambigously
replaced by constants.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
jtag_get/set_end_state() is now deprecated.
There were lots of places in the code where the end state was
unintentionally modified.
The big Q is whether there were any places where the intention
was to modify the end state. 0.5 is a long way off, so we'll
get a fair amount of testing.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Unused. If something should happen after context restore, then the
calling code can just do it afterwards.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Move semihosting cmd to the arm cmd group.
Targets that support semihosting will setup the
setup_semihosting callback function.
Signed-off-by: Spencer Oliver <ntfreak@users.sourceforge.net>
Keep a handle to the PC in "struct arm", and use it.
This register is used a fair amount, so this is a net
minor code shrink (other than some line length fixes),
but mostly it's to make things more readable.
For XScale, fix a dodgy sequence while stepping. It
was initializing a variable to a non-NULL value, then
updating it to handle the step-over-active-breakpoint
case, and then later testing for non-NULL to see if
it should reverse that step-over-active logic. It
should have done like ARM7/ARM9 does: init to NULL.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Teach most remaining ARM cores how to use the "reset-assert" event.
Same model as elsewhere: iff a handler is provided for that event,
use that instead of trying to assert SRST (which may be unavailable,
or inappropriate since it resets too much). Else no change.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Shrink some overlong lines. Add my 2009 copyright.
Move a declaration to the beginning of its block.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
DCC downloads should be enabled for any self repecting
openocd config file for arm7/9. Print out note about
it otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Provide helptext which was sometimes missing; update some of it
to be more accurate.
Usage syntax messages have the same EBNF as the User's Guide;
there should be no angle brackets in either place.
Fix the User's Guide in a few places to be more consistent (mostly
to use brackets not parentheses) and to recognize that parameter may
be entirely optional (in which case the command just displays output,
and changes nothing). Also reference NXP, not Philips, for LPC chips.
Don't use "&function"; functions are like arrays, their address
is their name. Shrink some overlong lines.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Handlers for commands
- arm7_9 semihosting <enable | disable>
- $_TARGETNAME arp_reset assert 1
didn't check if target has already been examined, and could
segfault when using the NULL pointer "arm7_9->eice_cache".
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Command "reset halt" checks if PC properly resets, issueing warning:
"PC was not 0. Does this target need srst_pulls_trst?".
Checking PC against 0 is not always correct.
Removed PC value check, as suggested by Øyvind Harboe.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: U-PROPRIET-28D9DF\PROPRIETAIRE <PROPRIETAIRE@propriet-28d9df.(none)>
These were all basically "can't happen" cases ... like having
state be corrupted by an alpha particle after the previous check
for whether a value was in-range.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The exception being declarations for drivers. Those should
be split out in some clean way -- like driver add/remove calls
made by initialization code -- but that's for another day.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Move most declarations in <target/armv4_5.h> to <target/arm.h>
and update users.
What's left in the older file is stuff that I think should be
removed ... the old register cache access stuff, which makes it
awkward to support microcontroller profile (Cortex-M) cores.
The armv4_5_run_algorithm() declaration was moved too, even
though it's not yet as generic as it probably ought to be.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Rename some (mostly) generic ARM functions:
armv4_5_arch_state() --> arm_arch_state()
armv4_5_get_gdb_reg_list() --> arm_get_gdb_reg_list()
armv4_5_init_arch_info() --> arm_init_arch_info()
Cores using the microcontroller profile may want a different
arch_state() routine though.
(Also fix strange indentation in arm_arch_state: use tabs only!
And update a call to it, removing assignment-in-conditional.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Fall back to software breakpoint when vector catch isn't available.
Possible enhancements:
- add extra optional command parameter to select high vectors
- add extra optional command parameter to select hardware breakpoint
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Store a flag and errno in in "struct arm".
Have "poll" output report when semihosting is active.
Shrink some of the affected lines.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Semihosting enables code running on an ARM target to use the
I/O facilities on the host computer. The target application must
be linked against a library that forwards operation requests by
using the SVC instruction that is trapped at the Supervisor Call
vector by the debugger. The "hosted" library version provided
with CodeSourcery's Sourcery G++ Lite for ARM EABI is one example.
This is currently available for ARM9 processors, but any ARM
variant should be able to support this with little additional work.
Tested using binaries compiled with Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q1-161
and ARM RVCT 3.0.
[dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net: doc tweaks, NEWS]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Changes from the flat namespace to heirarchical one. Instead of writing:
#include "time_support.h"
the following form should be used.
#include <helper/time_support.h>
The exception is from .c files in the same directory.
In target_type.h it's documented that the target must be
halted for add_breakpoint() ... and with slight ambiguity,
also for its add_watchpoint() sibling. So rather than
verifying that constraint in the CPU drivers, do it in the
target_add_{break,watch}point() routines.
Add minor paranoia on the remove_*point() paths too: save
the return value, and print it out in in the LOG_DEBUG message
in case it's nonzero.
Note that with some current cores, like all ARMv7 ones I've
looked at, there's no technical issue preventing watchpoint or
breakpoint add/remove operations on active cores. This model
seems deeply wired into OpenOCD though.
ALSO: the ARM targets were fairly "good" about enforcing that
constraint themselves. The MIPS ones were relied on other code
to catch such stuff, but it's not clear such code existed ...
keep an eye out for new issues on MIPS.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Uses chaining of command_registration structures to eliminate all
target_type register_callback routines. Exports the command_handler
registration arrays for those target types that are used by others.
Start using the arm_reg_current() call. This shrinks and speeds
the affected code. It can also prevent some coredumps coming from
invalid CPSR values ... the ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE() macro returns
bogus registers if e.g. "Secure Monitor" mode isn't supported by
the current CPU.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Have arm_set_cpsr() handle the two core state flags, updating
the CPU state. This eliminates code in various debug_entry()
paths, and marginally improves handling of the J bit.
Catch and comment a few holes in the handling of the J bit on
ARM926ejs cores ... it's unlikely our users will care about
Jazelle mode, but we can at least warn of Impending Doom. If
anyone does use it, these breadcrumbs may help them to find
the right path through the code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Define arm_reg_current() ... returning handle to a given register,
and encapsulating the current mode's register shadowing. It's got
one current use, for reporting the current register set to GDB.
This will let later patches clean up much ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE()
nastiness, saving a bit of code.
Define and use arm_set_cpsr() ... initially it updates the cached
CPSR and sets up state used by arm_reg_current(), plus any SPSR
handle. (Later: can also set up for T and J bits.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Stash a pointer to the CPSR in the "struct arm", to help get rid
of the (common) references to its index in the register cache.
This removes almost all references to CPSR offsets outside of the
toplevel ARM code ... except a pair related to the current ARM11
"simulator" logic (which should be removable soonish).
This is a net minor code shrink of a few hundred bytes of object
code, and also makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Implementations need to access the register struct they modify;
make it easier and less error-prone to identify the instance.
(This removes over 10% of the ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE nastiness...)
Plus some minor fixes noted when making these updates: ARM7/ARM9
accessor methods should be static; don't leave CPSR wrongly marked
"dirty"; note significant XScale omissions in register handling;
and have armv4_5_build_reg_cache() record its result.
Rename "struct armv4_5_core_reg" as "struct arm_reg"; it's used
for more than those older architecture generations.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Remove two commands that were documented as "debug commands"
and where "you probably don't want to use this". We never
intended to support them, and at least one problem report
boiled down to using this when it shouldn't have been used.
Update the docs on the existing register commands to talk a
bit more about register access and cache behavior. (Those
debug commands existed largely to *bypass* the cache.) And
fix some minor doc goofs that snuck in with recent changes,
renaming "armv4_5" as "arm" and "arm9tdmi" as "arm9".
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Øyvind Harboe
Drasko DRASKOVIC
Gary Carlson
Jun Ma
Antonio Borneo
Spencer Oliver
David Brownell
Nicolas Pitre
Zachary T Welch