riscv
/
OpenFPGA
mirror of https://github.com/lnis-uofu/OpenFPGA.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #89 from LNIS-Projects/dev 

Regression test & architecture updates
This commit is contained in:
Laboratory for Nano Integrated Systems (LNIS) 2020-09-21 22:53:34 -06:00 committed by GitHub
parent 9a995d143e aa5f5fc7e0
commit fba8dbe638
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
47 changed files with 1559 additions and 64 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
.travis/fpga_verilog_reg_test.sh
View File

@ -13,8 +13,11 @@ echo -e "FPGA-Verilog Feature Tests";
echo -e "Testing Verilog generation for LUTs: a single mode LUT6 FPGA using micro benchmarks";
python3 openfpga_flow/scripts/run_fpga_task.py fpga_verilog/lut_design/single_mode --debug --show_thread_logs
echo -e "Testing Verilog generation for LUTs: simple fracturable LUT4 ";
python3 openfpga_flow/scripts/run_fpga_task.py fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut4 --debug --show_thread_logs
echo -e "Testing Verilog generation for LUTs: simple fracturable LUT6 ";
python3 openfpga_flow/scripts/run_fpga_task.py fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut --debug --show_thread_logs
python3 openfpga_flow/scripts/run_fpga_task.py fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut6 --debug --show_thread_logs
echo -e "Testing Verilog generation for LUTs: LUT6 with intermediate buffers";
python3 openfpga_flow/scripts/run_fpga_task.py fpga_verilog/lut_design/intermediate_buffer --debug --show_thread_logs

92
openfpga/src/repack/repack.cpp
View File

@ -20,6 +20,73 @@
/* begin namespace openfpga */
namespace openfpga {
/***************************************************************************************
* Try to find sink pb graph pins through walking through the fan-out edges from
* the source pb graph pin
* Only the sink meeting the following requirements can be considered:
* - All the fan-out edges between the source and sink are from direct interconnection
* - sink is an input of a primitive pb_type
*
* Note:
* - If there is a fan-out of the current source pb graph pin is not a direct interconnection
* the direct search should stop.
* - This function is designed for pb graph without local routing
* For example: direct connection between root pb graph node to the LUT pb graph node
*
* root pb_graph_node
* +-----------------------------------------
* | Intermediate pb_graph_node
* | +----------------------------------
* | | primitive pb_graph_node
* | | +-------------------------
* I[0] ---->+------>+------->|I[0] LUT
*
* - This function is designed for passing wires inside pb graph
*
* root pb_graph_node
* +------------------------------+
* | Intermediate pb_graph_node |
* | +-------------+ |
* | | | |
* | | | |
* I[0]----->+------>+--- ... ---->+------->+------>O[0]
*
***************************************************************************************/
static
bool rec_direct_search_sink_pb_graph_pins(const t_pb_graph_pin* source_pb_pin,
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*>& sink_pb_pins) {
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_pins_to_search;
for (int iedge = 0; iedge < source_pb_pin->num_output_edges; ++iedge) {
if (DIRECT_INTERC != source_pb_pin->output_edges[iedge]->interconnect->type) {
return false;
}
for (int ipin = 0; ipin < source_pb_pin->output_edges[iedge]->num_output_pins; ++ipin) {
t_pb_graph_pin* cand_sink_pb_pin = source_pb_pin->output_edges[iedge]->output_pins[ipin];
if ( (true == is_primitive_pb_type(cand_sink_pb_pin->parent_node->pb_type))
&& (IN_PORT == cand_sink_pb_pin->port->type)) {
sink_pb_pins.push_back(cand_sink_pb_pin);
} else if ( (true == cand_sink_pb_pin->parent_node->is_root())
&& (OUT_PORT == cand_sink_pb_pin->port->type)) {
sink_pb_pins.push_back(cand_sink_pb_pin);
} else {
sink_pb_pins_to_search.push_back(cand_sink_pb_pin);
}
}
}
for (t_pb_graph_pin* sink_pb_pin : sink_pb_pins_to_search) {
bool direct_search_status = rec_direct_search_sink_pb_graph_pins(sink_pb_pin, sink_pb_pins);
if (false == direct_search_status) {
return false;
}
}
/* Reach here, we succeed. */
return true;
}
/***************************************************************************************
* Try find all the sink pins which is mapped to a routing trace in the context of pb route
* This function uses a recursive walk-through over the pb_route
@ -133,13 +200,32 @@ void rec_find_routed_sink_pb_graph_pins(const t_pb* pb,
static
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> find_routed_pb_graph_pins_atom_net(const t_pb* pb,
const t_pb_graph_pin* source_pb_pin,
const t_pb_graph_pin* packing_source_pb_pin,
const AtomNetId& atom_net_id,
const VprDeviceAnnotation& device_annotation,
const std::map<const t_pb_graph_pin*, AtomNetId>& pb_pin_mapped_nets,
t_pb_graph_pin** pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index) {
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_pins;
rec_find_routed_sink_pb_graph_pins(pb, source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index, sink_pb_pins);
/* Try to directly search for sink pb_pins from the source_pb_pin,
* which is the actual source pin to be routed from
* Note that the packing source_pb_pin is the source pin considered by
* VPR packer, but may not be the actual source!!!
*/
if (true == source_pb_pin->parent_node->is_root()) {
bool direct_search_status = rec_direct_search_sink_pb_graph_pins(source_pb_pin, sink_pb_pins);
if (true == direct_search_status) {
VTR_ASSERT(!sink_pb_pins.empty());
/* We have find through direct searching, return now */
return sink_pb_pins;
}
/* Cannot find through direct searching, reset results */
VTR_ASSERT_SAFE(false == direct_search_status);
sink_pb_pins.clear();
}
rec_find_routed_sink_pb_graph_pins(pb, packing_source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index, sink_pb_pins);
return sink_pb_pins;
}
@ -339,7 +425,7 @@ void add_lb_router_nets(LbRouter& lb_router,
VTR_ASSERT(nullptr != packing_source_pb_pin);
/* Find all the sink pins in the pb_route, we walk through the input pins and find the pin */
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_graph_pins = find_routed_pb_graph_pins_atom_net(pb, packing_source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index);
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_graph_pins = find_routed_pb_graph_pins_atom_net(pb, source_pb_pin, packing_source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index);
std::vector<LbRRNodeId> sink_lb_rr_nodes = find_lb_net_physical_sink_lb_rr_nodes(lb_rr_graph, sink_pb_graph_pins, device_annotation);
VTR_ASSERT(sink_lb_rr_nodes.size() == sink_pb_graph_pins.size());
@ -404,7 +490,7 @@ void add_lb_router_nets(LbRouter& lb_router,
VTR_ASSERT(AtomNetId::INVALID() != atom_net_id);
/* Find all the sink pins in the pb_route */
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_graph_pins = find_routed_pb_graph_pins_atom_net(pb, source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index);
std::vector<t_pb_graph_pin*> sink_pb_graph_pins = find_routed_pb_graph_pins_atom_net(pb, physical_source_pb_pin, source_pb_pin, atom_net_id, device_annotation, pb_pin_mapped_nets, pb_graph_pin_lookup_from_index);
std::vector<LbRRNodeId> sink_lb_rr_nodes = find_lb_net_physical_sink_lb_rr_nodes(lb_rr_graph, sink_pb_graph_pins, device_annotation);
VTR_ASSERT(sink_lb_rr_nodes.size() == sink_pb_graph_pins.size());

74
openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
# Run VPR for the 'and' design
#--write_rr_graph example_rr_graph.xml
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route --device ${OPENFPGA_VPR_DEVICE_LAYOUT}
# Read OpenFPGA architecture definition
read_openfpga_arch -f ${OPENFPGA_ARCH_FILE}
# Read OpenFPGA simulation settings
read_openfpga_simulation_setting -f ${OPENFPGA_SIM_SETTING_FILE}
# Annotate the OpenFPGA architecture to VPR data base
# to debug use --verbose options
link_openfpga_arch --activity_file ${ACTIVITY_FILE} --sort_gsb_chan_node_in_edges
# Check and correct any naming conflicts in the BLIF netlist
check_netlist_naming_conflict --fix --report ./netlist_renaming.xml
# Apply fix-up to clustering nets based on routing results
pb_pin_fixup --verbose
# Apply fix-up to Look-Up Table truth tables based on packing results
lut_truth_table_fixup
# Build the module graph
# - Enabled compression on routing architecture modules
# - Enable pin duplication on grid modules
build_fabric --compress_routing #--verbose
# Write the fabric hierarchy of module graph to a file
# This is used by hierarchical PnR flows
write_fabric_hierarchy --file ./fabric_hierarchy.txt
# Repack the netlist to physical pbs
# This must be done before bitstream generator and testbench generation
# Strongly recommend it is done after all the fix-up have been applied
repack #--verbose
# Build the bitstream
# - Output the fabric-independent bitstream to a file
build_architecture_bitstream --verbose --write_file fabric_independent_bitstream.xml
# Build fabric-dependent bitstream
build_fabric_bitstream --verbose
# Write fabric-dependent bitstream
write_fabric_bitstream --file fabric_bitstream.xml --format xml
# Write the Verilog netlist for FPGA fabric
# - Enable the use of explicit port mapping in Verilog netlist
write_fabric_verilog --file ./SRC --explicit_port_mapping --include_timing --include_signal_init --support_icarus_simulator --print_user_defined_template --verbose
# Write the Verilog testbench for FPGA fabric
# - We suggest the use of same output directory as fabric Verilog netlists
# - Must specify the reference benchmark file if you want to output any testbenches
# - Enable top-level testbench which is a full verification including programming circuit and core logic of FPGA
# - Enable pre-configured top-level testbench which is a fast verification skipping programming phase
# - Simulation ini file is optional and is needed only when you need to interface different HDL simulators using openfpga flow-run scripts
write_verilog_testbench --file ./SRC --reference_benchmark_file_path ${REFERENCE_VERILOG_TESTBENCH} --print_top_testbench --print_preconfig_top_testbench --print_simulation_ini ./SimulationDeck/simulation_deck.ini --explicit_port_mapping
# Write the SDC files for PnR backend
# - Turn on every options here
write_pnr_sdc --file ./SDC
# Write SDC to disable timing for configure ports
write_sdc_disable_timing_configure_ports --file ./SDC/disable_configure_ports.sdc
# Write the SDC to run timing analysis for a mapped FPGA fabric
write_analysis_sdc --file ./SDC_analysis
# Finish and exit OpenFPGA
exit
# Note :
# To run verification at the end of the flow maintain source in ./SRC directory

2
openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/flatten_routing_example_script.openfpga
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Run VPR for the 'and' design
#--write_rr_graph example_rr_graph.xml
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route --device ${OPENFPGA_VPR_DEVICE_LAYOUT}
# Read OpenFPGA architecture definition
read_openfpga_arch -f ${OPENFPGA_ARCH_FILE}

2
openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/generate_secure_fabric_from_key_example_script.openfpga
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Run VPR for the 'and' design
#--write_rr_graph example_rr_graph.xml
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route --device ${OPENFPGA_VPR_DEVICE_LAYOUT}
# Read OpenFPGA architecture definition
read_openfpga_arch -f ${OPENFPGA_ARCH_FILE}

2
openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/load_external_arch_bitstream_example_script.openfpga
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Run VPR for the 'and' design
#--write_rr_graph example_rr_graph.xml
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route
vpr ${VPR_ARCH_FILE} ${VPR_TESTBENCH_BLIF} --clock_modeling route --device ${OPENFPGA_VPR_DEVICE_LAYOUT}
# Read OpenFPGA architecture definition
read_openfpga_arch -f ${OPENFPGA_ARCH_FILE}

231
openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm_cc_openfpga.xml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
<!-- Architecture annotation for OpenFPGA framework
This annotation supports the k6_N10_40nm.xml
- General purpose logic block
- K = 6, N = 10, I = 40
- Single mode
- Routing architecture
- L = 4, fc_in = 0.15, fc_out = 0.1
-->
<openfpga_architecture>
<technology_library>
<device_library>
<device_model name="logic" type="transistor">
<lib type="industry" corner="TOP_TT" ref="M" path="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/tech/PTM_45nm/45nm.pm"/>
<design vdd="0.9" pn_ratio="2"/>
<pmos name="pch" chan_length="40e-9" min_width="140e-9" variation="logic_transistor_var"/>
<nmos name="nch" chan_length="40e-9" min_width="140e-9" variation="logic_transistor_var"/>
</device_model>
<device_model name="io" type="transistor">
<lib type="academia" ref="M" path="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/tech/PTM_45nm/45nm.pm"/>
<design vdd="2.5" pn_ratio="3"/>
<pmos name="pch_25" chan_length="270e-9" min_width="320e-9" variation="io_transistor_var"/>
<nmos name="nch_25" chan_length="270e-9" min_width="320e-9" variation="io_transistor_var"/>
</device_model>
</device_library>
<variation_library>
<variation name="logic_transistor_var" abs_deviation="0.1" num_sigma="3"/>
<variation name="io_transistor_var" abs_deviation="0.1" num_sigma="3"/>
</variation_library>
</technology_library>
<circuit_library>
<circuit_model type="inv_buf" name="INVTX1" prefix="INVTX1" is_default="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" topology="inverter" size="1"/>
<device_technology device_model_name="logic"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<delay_matrix type="rise" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
<delay_matrix type="fall" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="inv_buf" name="buf4" prefix="buf4" is_default="false">
<design_technology type="cmos" topology="buffer" size="1" num_level="2" f_per_stage="4"/>
<device_technology device_model_name="logic"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<delay_matrix type="rise" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
<delay_matrix type="fall" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="inv_buf" name="tap_buf4" prefix="tap_buf4" is_default="false">
<design_technology type="cmos" topology="buffer" size="1" num_level="3" f_per_stage="4"/>
<device_technology device_model_name="logic"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<delay_matrix type="rise" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
<delay_matrix type="fall" in_port="in" out_port="out">
10e-12
</delay_matrix>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="gate" name="OR2" prefix="OR2" is_default="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" topology="OR"/>
<device_technology device_model_name="logic"/>
<input_buffer exist="false"/>
<output_buffer exist="false"/>
<port type="input" prefix="a" size="1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="b" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<delay_matrix type="rise" in_port="a b" out_port="out">
10e-12 5e-12
</delay_matrix>
<delay_matrix type="fall" in_port="a b" out_port="out">
10e-12 5e-12
</delay_matrix>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="pass_gate" name="TGATE" prefix="TGATE" is_default="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" topology="transmission_gate" nmos_size="1" pmos_size="2"/>
<device_technology device_model_name="logic"/>
<input_buffer exist="false"/>
<output_buffer exist="false"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="sel" size="1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="selb" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<delay_matrix type="rise" in_port="in sel selb" out_port="out">
10e-12 5e-12 5e-12
</delay_matrix>
<delay_matrix type="fall" in_port="in sel selb" out_port="out">
10e-12 5e-12 5e-12
</delay_matrix>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="chan_wire" name="chan_segment" prefix="track_seg" is_default="true">
<design_technology type="cmos"/>
<input_buffer exist="false"/>
<output_buffer exist="false"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<wire_param model_type="pi" R="101" C="22.5e-15" num_level="1"/> <!-- model_type could be T, res_val and cap_val DON'T CARE -->
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="wire" name="direct_interc" prefix="direct_interc" is_default="true">
<design_technology type="cmos"/>
<input_buffer exist="false"/>
<output_buffer exist="false"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<wire_param model_type="pi" R="0" C="0" num_level="1"/> <!-- model_type could be T, res_val cap_val should be defined -->
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="mux" name="mux_2level" prefix="mux_2level" dump_structural_verilog="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" structure="multi_level" num_level="2" add_const_input="true" const_input_val="1"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<pass_gate_logic circuit_model_name="TGATE"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="sram" size="1"/>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="mux" name="mux_2level_tapbuf" prefix="mux_2level_tapbuf" dump_structural_verilog="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" structure="multi_level" num_level="2" add_const_input="true" const_input_val="1"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="tap_buf4"/>
<pass_gate_logic circuit_model_name="TGATE"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="sram" size="1"/>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="mux" name="mux_1level_tapbuf" prefix="mux_1level_tapbuf" is_default="true" dump_structural_verilog="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" structure="one_level" add_const_input="true" const_input_val="1"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="tap_buf4"/>
<pass_gate_logic circuit_model_name="TGATE"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="out" size="1"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="sram" size="1"/>
</circuit_model>
<!--DFF subckt ports should be defined as <D> <Q> <CLK> <RESET> <SET> -->
<circuit_model type="ff" name="static_dff" prefix="dff" spice_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/SpiceNetlists/ff.sp" verilog_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/VerilogNetlists/ff.v">
<design_technology type="cmos"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="D" size="1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="set" size="1" is_global="true" default_val="0" is_set="true"/>
<port type="input" prefix="reset" size="1" is_global="true" default_val="0" is_reset="true"/>
<port type="output" prefix="Q" size="1"/>
<port type="clock" prefix="clk" size="1" is_global="true" default_val="0" />
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="lut" name="frac_lut4" prefix="frac_lut4" dump_structural_verilog="true">
<design_technology type="cmos" fracturable_lut="true"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<lut_input_inverter exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<lut_input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="buf4"/>
<lut_intermediate_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="buf4" location_map="-1-"/>
<pass_gate_logic circuit_model_name="TGATE"/>
<port type="input" prefix="in" size="4" tri_state_map="---1" circuit_model_name="OR2"/>
<port type="output" prefix="lut3_out" size="2" lut_frac_level="3" lut_output_mask="0,1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="lut4_out" size="1" lut_output_mask="0"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="sram" size="16"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="mode" size="1" mode_select="true" circuit_model_name="sc_dff_compact" default_val="1"/>
</circuit_model>
<!--Scan-chain DFF subckt ports should be defined as <D> <Q> <Qb> <CLK> <RESET> <SET> -->
<circuit_model type="ccff" name="sc_dff_compact" prefix="scff" spice_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/SpiceNetlists/ff.sp" verilog_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/VerilogNetlists/ff.v">
<design_technology type="cmos"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="pReset" lib_name="reset" size="1" is_global="true" default_val="0" is_reset="true" is_prog="true"/>
<port type="input" prefix="D" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="Q" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="Qb" size="1"/>
<port type="clock" prefix="prog_clk" lib_name="clk" size="1" is_global="true" default_val="0" is_prog="true"/>
</circuit_model>
<circuit_model type="iopad" name="iopad" prefix="iopad" spice_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/SpiceNetlists/io.sp" verilog_netlist="${OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/VerilogNetlists/io.v">
<design_technology type="cmos"/>
<input_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<output_buffer exist="true" circuit_model_name="INVTX1"/>
<port type="inout" prefix="pad" size="1" is_global="true" is_io="true"/>
<port type="sram" prefix="en" size="1" mode_select="true" circuit_model_name="sc_dff_compact" default_val="1"/>
<port type="input" prefix="outpad" size="1"/>
<port type="output" prefix="inpad" size="1"/>
</circuit_model>
</circuit_library>
<configuration_protocol>
<organization type="scan_chain" circuit_model_name="sc_dff_compact"/>
</configuration_protocol>
<connection_block>
<switch name="ipin_cblock" circuit_model_name="mux_2level_tapbuf"/>
</connection_block>
<switch_block>
<switch name="0" circuit_model_name="mux_2level_tapbuf"/>
</switch_block>
<routing_segment>
<segment name="L4" circuit_model_name="chan_segment"/>
</routing_segment>
<pb_type_annotations>
<!-- physical pb_type binding in complex block IO -->
<pb_type name="io" physical_mode_name="physical" idle_mode_name="inpad"/>
<pb_type name="io[physical].iopad" circuit_model_name="iopad" mode_bits="1"/>
<pb_type name="io[inpad].inpad" physical_pb_type_name="io[physical].iopad" mode_bits="1"/>
<pb_type name="io[outpad].outpad" physical_pb_type_name="io[physical].iopad" mode_bits="0"/>
<!-- End physical pb_type binding in complex block IO -->
<!-- physical pb_type binding in complex block CLB -->
<!-- physical mode will be the default mode if not specified -->
<pb_type name="clb">
<!-- Binding interconnect to circuit models as their physical implementation, if not defined, we use the default model -->
<interconnect name="crossbar" circuit_model_name="mux_2level"/>
</pb_type>
<pb_type name="clb.fle" physical_mode_name="physical"/>
<pb_type name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.frac_logic.frac_lut4" circuit_model_name="frac_lut4" mode_bits="0"/>
<pb_type name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.ff" circuit_model_name="static_dff"/>
<!-- Binding operating pb_type to physical pb_type -->
<pb_type name="clb.fle[n2_lut3].lut3inter.ble3.lut3" physical_pb_type_name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.frac_logic.frac_lut4" mode_bits="1" physical_pb_type_index_factor="0.5">
<!-- Binding the lut3 to the first 3 inputs of fracturable lut4 -->
<port name="in" physical_mode_port="in[0:2]"/>
<port name="out" physical_mode_port="lut3_out[0:0]" physical_mode_pin_rotate_offset="1"/>
</pb_type>
<pb_type name="clb.fle[n2_lut3].lut3inter.ble3.ff" physical_pb_type_name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.ff"/>
<pb_type name="clb.fle[n1_lut4].ble4.lut4" physical_pb_type_name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.frac_logic.frac_lut4" mode_bits="0">
<!-- Binding the lut4 to the first 4 inputs of fracturable lut4 -->
<port name="in" physical_mode_port="in[0:3]"/>
<port name="out" physical_mode_port="lut4_out"/>
</pb_type>
<pb_type name="clb.fle[n1_lut4].ble4.ff" physical_pb_type_name="clb.fle[physical].fabric.ff" physical_pb_type_index_factor="2" physical_pb_type_index_offset="0"/>
<!-- End physical pb_type binding in complex block IO -->
</pb_type_annotations>
</openfpga_architecture>

1
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_bitstream/load_external_architecture_bitstream/config/task.conf
View File

@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_N4_40nm_frame_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_external_arch_bitstream_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/arch_bitstreams/and2_k4_N4_tileable_40nm_bitstream.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/bram/dpram16k/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=3x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/bram/wide_dpram16k/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=4x4
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_wide_mem16K_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/fabric_chain/adder_chain/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_column_chain_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/fabric_chain/register_chain/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_register_chain_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_chain_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/fabric_chain/scan_chain/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_register_scan_chain_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_scan_chain_40nm.xml

1
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/fabric_key/load_external_key/config/task.conf
View File

@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_N4_40nm_frame_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
external_fabric_key_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/fabric_keys/k4_N4_2x2_sample_key.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_40nm.xml

1
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/fabric_key/load_external_key_cc_fpga/config/task.conf
View File

@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_N4_40nm_cc_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
external_fabric_key_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/fabric_keys/k4_N4_2x2_sample_key.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=2x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_40nm.xml

5
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/flatten_routing/config/task.conf
View File

@ -17,11 +17,12 @@ fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/flatten_routing_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm_cc_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=4x4
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_40nm.xml
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_frac_N4_tileable_40nm.xml
[BENCHMARKS]
bench0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2/and2.blif

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/io/aib/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_aib_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=3x4
#####################################
# Debugging status

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/io/multi_io_capacity/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=3x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_multi_io_capacity_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/io/reduced_io/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=3x2
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_reduced_io_40nm.xml

49
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut4/config/task.conf Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
# = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
# Configuration file for running experiments
# = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
# timeout_each_job : FPGA Task script splits fpga flow into multiple jobs
# Each job execute fpga_flow script on combination of architecture & benchmark
# timeout_each_job is timeout for each job
# = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
[GENERAL]
run_engine=openfpga_shell
power_tech_file = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/tech/PTM_45nm/45nm.xml
power_analysis = true
spice_output=false
verilog_output=true
timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm_cc_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_frac_N4_tileable_40nm.xml
[BENCHMARKS]
#
bench0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2/and2.blif
bench1=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/routing_test/routing_test.blif
bench2=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2_or2/and2_or2.blif
# Modelsim is ok with this but icarus fails due to poor support on timing and looping
#bench2=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2_latch/and2_latch.blif
[SYNTHESIS_PARAM]
bench0_top = and2
bench0_act = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2/and2.act
bench0_verilog = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2/and2.v
bench1_top = routing_test
bench1_act = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/routing_test/routing_test.act
bench1_verilog = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/routing_test/routing_test.v
bench2_top = and2_or2
bench2_act = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2_or2/and2_or2.act
bench2_verilog = ${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2_or2/and2_or2.v
[SCRIPT_PARAM_MIN_ROUTE_CHAN_WIDTH]
end_flow_with_test=
vpr_fpga_verilog_formal_verification_top_netlist=

0
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut/config/task.conf → openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/lut_design/frac_lut6/config/task.conf
View File

2
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/spypad/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fast_configuration_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_register_scan_chain_depop50_spypad_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/thru_channel/thru_narrow_tile/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=4x4
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_thru_channel_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm.xml

3
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/thru_channel/thru_wide_tile/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=4x4
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_thru_channel_adder_chain_wide_mem16K_40nm.xml

7
openfpga_flow/tasks/fpga_verilog/untileable/config/task.conf
View File

@ -16,12 +16,13 @@ timeout_each_job = 20*60
fpga_flow=vpr_blif
[OpenFPGA_SHELL]
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k6_frac_N10_40nm_openfpga.xml
openfpga_shell_template=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/OpenFPGAShellScripts/fix_device_example_script.openfpga
openfpga_arch_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm_cc_openfpga.xml
openfpga_sim_setting_file=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/openfpga_simulation_settings/auto_sim_openfpga.xml
openfpga_vpr_device_layout=4x4
[ARCHITECTURES]
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_40nm.xml
arch0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm.xml
[BENCHMARKS]
bench0=${PATH:OPENFPGA_PATH}/openfpga_flow/benchmarks/micro_benchmark/and2/and2.blif

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_40nm.xml
View File

@ -63,7 +63,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -71,7 +77,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!--/auto_layout-->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_full_output_crossbar_40nm.xml
View File

@ -64,7 +64,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -72,7 +78,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!--/auto_layout-->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

13
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_N4_tileable_no_local_routing_40nm.xml
View File

@ -67,7 +67,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -75,7 +81,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!--/auto_layout-->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM
@ -202,6 +207,10 @@
routing area up significantly, we estimate into the ~70% range.
-->
<pb_type name="clb">
<!-- FIXME These inputs should be logic equivalent
However, current annotation engine does not support this
The feature should be enabled after patching
-->
<input name="I0" num_pins="4" equivalent="full"/>
<input name="I1" num_pins="4" equivalent="full"/>
<input name="I2" num_pins="4" equivalent="full"/>

449
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_frac_N4_40nm.xml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
<!--
Flagship Heterogeneous Architecture (No Carry Chains) for VTR 7.0.
- 40 nm technology
- General purpose logic block:
K = 4, N = 4, fracturable 4 LUTs (can operate as one 4-LUT or two 3-LUTs with all 3 inputs shared)
with optionally registered outputs
- Routing architecture: L = 4, fc_in = 0.15, Fc_out = 0.1
Details on Modelling:
Based on flagship k4_frac_N4_mem32K_40nm.xml architecture.
Authors: Jason Luu, Jeff Goeders, Vaughn Betz
-->
<architecture>
<!--
ODIN II specific config begins
Describes the types of user-specified netlist blocks (in blif, this corresponds to
".model [type_of_block]") that this architecture supports.
Note: Basic LUTs, I/Os, and flip-flops are not included here as there are
already special structures in blif (.names, .input, .output, and .latch)
that describe them.
-->
<models>
<!-- A virtual model for I/O to be used in the physical mode of io block -->
<model name="io">
<input_ports>
<port name="outpad"/>
</input_ports>
<output_ports>
<port name="inpad"/>
</output_ports>
</model>
<!-- A virtual model for I/O to be used in the physical mode of io block -->
<model name="frac_lut4">
<input_ports>
<port name="in"/>
</input_ports>
<output_ports>
<port name="lut3_out"/>
<port name="lut4_out"/>
</output_ports>
</model>
</models>
<tiles>
<!-- Do NOT add clock pins to I/O here!!! VPR does not build clock network in the way that OpenFPGA can support
If you need to register the I/O, define clocks in the circuit models
These clocks can be handled in back-end
-->
<tile name="io" capacity="8" area="0">
<equivalent_sites>
<site pb_type="io"/>
</equivalent_sites>
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
<fc in_type="frac" in_val="0.15" out_type="frac" out_val="0.10"/>
<pinlocations pattern="custom">
<loc side="left">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="top">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="right">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="bottom">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
</pinlocations>
</tile>
<tile name="clb" area="53894">
<equivalent_sites>
<site pb_type="clb"/>
</equivalent_sites>
<input name="I" num_pins="12" equivalent="full"/>
<output name="O" num_pins="8" equivalent="none"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<fc in_type="frac" in_val="0.15" out_type="frac" out_val="0.10"/>
<pinlocations pattern="spread"/>
</tile>
</tiles>
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="false">
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="6" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM
models. We are modifying the delay values however, to include metal C and R, which allows more architecture
experimentation. We are also modifying the relative resistance of PMOS to be 1.8x that of NMOS
(vs. Ian's 3x) as 1.8x lines up with Jeff G's data from a 45 nm process (and is more typical of
45 nm in general). I'm upping the Rmin_nmos from Ian's just over 6k to nearly 9k, and dropping
RminW_pmos from 18k to 16k to hit this 1.8x ratio, while keeping the delays of buffers approximately
lined up with Stratix IV.
We are using Jeff G.'s capacitance data for 45 nm (in tech/ptm_45nm).
Jeff's tables list C in for transistors with widths in multiples of the minimum feature size (45 nm).
The minimum contactable transistor is 2.5 * 45 nm, so I need to multiply drive strength sizes in this file
by 2.5x when looking up in Jeff's tables.
The delay values are lined up with Stratix IV, which has an architecture similar to this
proposed FPGA, and which is also 40 nm
C_ipin_cblock: input capacitance of a track buffer, which VPR assumes is a single-stage
4x minimum drive strength buffer. -->
<sizing R_minW_nmos="8926" R_minW_pmos="16067"/>
<!-- The grid_logic_tile_area below will be used for all blocks that do not explicitly set their own (non-routing)
area; set to 0 since we explicitly set the area of all blocks currently in this architecture file.
-->
<area grid_logic_tile_area="0"/>
<chan_width_distr>
<x distr="uniform" peak="1.000000"/>
<y distr="uniform" peak="1.000000"/>
</chan_width_distr>
<switch_block type="wilton" fs="3" sub_type="subset" sub_fs="3"/>
<connection_block input_switch_name="ipin_cblock"/>
</device>
<switchlist>
<!-- VB: the mux_trans_size and buf_size data below is in minimum width transistor *areas*, assuming the purple
book area formula. This means the mux transistors are about 5x minimum drive strength.
We assume the first stage of the buffer is 3x min drive strength to be reasonable given the large
mux transistors, and this gives a reasonable stage ratio of a bit over 5x to the second stage. We assume
the n and p transistors in the first stage are equal-sized to lower the buffer trip point, since it's fed
by a pass transistor mux. We can then reverse engineer the buffer second stage to hit the specified
buf_size (really buffer area) - 16.2x minimum drive nmos and 1.8*16.2 = 29.2x minimum drive.
I then took the data from Jeff G.'s PTM modeling of 45 nm to get the Cin (gate of first stage) and Cout
(diff of second stage) listed below. Jeff's models are in tech/ptm_45nm, and are in min feature multiples.
The minimum contactable transistor is 2.5 * 45 nm, so I need to multiply the drive strength sizes above by
2.5x when looking up in Jeff's tables.
Finally, we choose a switch delay (58 ps) that leads to length 4 wires having a delay equal to that of SIV of 126 ps.
This also leads to the switch being 46% of the total wire delay, which is reasonable. -->
<switch type="mux" name="0" R="551" Cin=".77e-15" Cout="4e-15" Tdel="58e-12" mux_trans_size="2.630740" buf_size="27.645901"/>
<!--switch ipin_cblock resistance set to yeild for 4x minimum drive strength buffer-->
<switch type="mux" name="ipin_cblock" R="2231.5" Cout="0." Cin="1.47e-15" Tdel="7.247000e-11" mux_trans_size="1.222260" buf_size="auto"/>
</switchlist>
<segmentlist>
<!--- VB & JL: using ITRS metal stack data, 96 nm half pitch wires, which are intermediate metal width/space.
With the 96 nm half pitch, such wires would take 60 um of height, vs. a 90 nm high (approximated as square) Stratix IV tile so this seems
reasonable. Using a tile length of 90 nm, corresponding to the length of a Stratix IV tile if it were square. -->
<!-- GIVE a specific name for the segment! OpenFPGA appreciate that! -->
<segment name="L4" freq="1.000000" length="4" type="unidir" Rmetal="101" Cmetal="22.5e-15">
<mux name="0"/>
<sb type="pattern">1 1 1 1 1</sb>
<cb type="pattern">1 1 1 1</cb>
</segment>
</segmentlist>
<complexblocklist>
<!-- Define I/O pads begin -->
<!-- Capacity is a unique property of I/Os, it is the maximum number of I/Os that can be placed at the same (X,Y) location on the FPGA -->
<!-- Not sure of the area of an I/O (varies widely), and it's not relevant to the design of the FPGA core, so we're setting it to 0. -->
<pb_type name="io">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Do NOT add clock pins to I/O here!!! VPR does not build clock network in the way that OpenFPGA can support
If you need to register the I/O, define clocks in the circuit models
These clocks can be handled in back-end
-->
<!-- A mode denotes the physical implementation of an I/O
This mode will be not packable but is mainly used for fabric verilog generation
-->
<mode name="physical" disabled_in_pack="true">
<pb_type name="iopad" blif_model=".subckt io" num_pb="1">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="outpad" input="io.outpad" output="iopad.outpad">
<delay_constant max="1.394e-11" in_port="io.outpad" out_port="iopad.outpad"/>
</direct>
<direct name="inpad" input="iopad.inpad" output="io.inpad">
<delay_constant max="4.243e-11" in_port="iopad.inpad" out_port="io.inpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- IOs can operate as either inputs or outputs.
Delays below come from Ian Kuon. They are small, so they should be interpreted as
the delays to and from registers in the I/O (and generally I/Os are registered
today and that is when you timing analyze them.
-->
<mode name="inpad">
<pb_type name="inpad" blif_model=".input" num_pb="1">
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="inpad" input="inpad.inpad" output="io.inpad">
<delay_constant max="4.243e-11" in_port="inpad.inpad" out_port="io.inpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<mode name="outpad">
<pb_type name="outpad" blif_model=".output" num_pb="1">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="outpad" input="io.outpad" output="outpad.outpad">
<delay_constant max="1.394e-11" in_port="io.outpad" out_port="outpad.outpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Every input pin is driven by 15% of the tracks in a channel, every output pin is driven by 10% of the tracks in a channel -->
<!-- IOs go on the periphery of the FPGA, for consistency,
make it physically equivalent on all sides so that only one definition of I/Os is needed.
If I do not make a physically equivalent definition, then I need to define 4 different I/Os, one for each side of the FPGA
-->
<!-- Place I/Os on the sides of the FPGA -->
<power method="ignore"/>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define I/O pads ends -->
<!-- Define general purpose logic block (CLB) begin -->
<!--- Area calculation: Total Stratix IV tile area is about 8100 um^2, and a minimum width transistor
area is 60 L^2 yields a tile area of 84375 MWTAs.
Routing at W=300 is 30481 MWTAs, leaving us with a total of 53000 MWTAs for logic block area
This means that only 37% of our area is in the general routing, and 63% is inside the logic
block. Note that the crossbar / local interconnect is considered part of the logic block
area in this analysis. That is a lower proportion of of routing area than most academics
assume, but note that the total routing area really includes the crossbar, which would push
routing area up significantly, we estimate into the ~70% range.
-->
<pb_type name="clb">
<input name="I" num_pins="12" equivalent="full"/>
<output name="O" num_pins="8" equivalent="none"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Describe fracturable logic element.
Each fracturable logic element has a 6-LUT that can alternatively operate as two 5-LUTs with shared inputs.
The outputs of the fracturable logic element can be optionally registered
-->
<pb_type name="fle" num_pb="4">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Physical mode definition begin (physical implementation of the fle) -->
<mode name="physical" disabled_in_pack="true">
<pb_type name="fabric" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<pb_type name="frac_logic" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<!-- Define LUT -->
<pb_type name="frac_lut4" blif_model=".subckt frac_lut4" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="lut3_out" num_pins="2"/>
<output name="lut4_out" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="frac_logic.in" output="frac_lut4.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="frac_lut4.lut3_out[1]" output="frac_logic.out[1]"/>
<!-- Xifan Tang: I use out[0] because the output of lut6 in lut6 mode is wired to the out[0] -->
<mux name="mux1" input="frac_lut4.lut4_out frac_lut4.lut3_out[0]" output="frac_logic.out[0]"/>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="2" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fabric.in" output="frac_logic.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="frac_logic.out[1:0]" output="ff[1:0].D"/>
<complete name="direct3" input="fabric.clk" output="ff[1:0].clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff[0].Q frac_logic.out[0]" output="fabric.out[0]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="frac_logic.out[0]" out_port="fabric.out[0]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[0].Q" out_port="fabric.out[0]"/>
</mux>
<mux name="mux2" input="ff[1].Q frac_logic.out[1]" output="fabric.out[1]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="frac_logic.out[1]" out_port="fabric.out[1]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[1].Q" out_port="fabric.out[1]"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in" output="fabric.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="fabric.out" output="fle.out"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="fabric.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Physical mode definition end (physical implementation of the fle) -->
<!-- Dual 3-LUT mode definition begin -->
<mode name="n2_lut3">
<pb_type name="lut3inter" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="3"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<pb_type name="ble3" num_pb="2">
<input name="in" num_pins="3"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Define the LUT -->
<pb_type name="lut3" blif_model=".names" num_pb="1" class="lut">
<input name="in" num_pins="3" port_class="lut_in"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1" port_class="lut_out"/>
<!-- LUT timing using delay matrix -->
<!-- These are the physical delay inputs on a Stratix IV LUT but because VPR cannot do LUT rebalancing,
we instead take the average of these numbers to get more stable results
82e-12
173e-12
261e-12
263e-12
398e-12
-->
<delay_matrix type="max" in_port="lut3.in" out_port="lut3.out">
235e-12
235e-12
235e-12
</delay_matrix>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define the flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="1" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="ble3.in[2:0]" output="lut3[0:0].in[2:0]"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3[0:0].out" output="ff[0:0].D">
<!-- Advanced user option that tells CAD tool to find LUT+FF pairs in netlist -->
<pack_pattern name="ble3" in_port="lut3[0:0].out" out_port="ff[0:0].D"/>
</direct>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble3.clk" output="ff[0:0].clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff[0:0].Q lut3.out[0:0]" output="ble3.out[0:0]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="lut3.out[0:0]" out_port="ble3.out[0:0]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[0:0].Q" out_port="ble3.out[0:0]"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="lut3inter.in" output="ble3[0:0].in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3inter.in" output="ble3[1:1].in"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble3[1:0].out" output="lut3inter.out"/>
<complete name="complete1" input="lut3inter.clk" output="ble3[1:0].clk"/>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in[2:0]" output="lut3inter.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3inter.out" output="fle.out"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="lut3inter.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Dual 3-LUT mode definition end -->
<!-- 4-LUT mode definition begin -->
<mode name="n1_lut4">
<!-- Define 4-LUT mode -->
<pb_type name="ble4" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Define LUT -->
<pb_type name="lut4" blif_model=".names" num_pb="1" class="lut">
<input name="in" num_pins="4" port_class="lut_in"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1" port_class="lut_out"/>
<!-- LUT timing using delay matrix -->
<!-- These are the physical delay inputs on a Stratix IV LUT but because VPR cannot do LUT rebalancing,
we instead take the average of these numbers to get more stable results
82e-12
173e-12
261e-12
263e-12
398e-12
397e-12
-->
<delay_matrix type="max" in_port="lut4.in" out_port="lut4.out">
261e-12
261e-12
261e-12
261e-12
</delay_matrix>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="1" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="ble4.in" output="lut4[0:0].in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut4.out" output="ff.D">
<!-- Advanced user option that tells CAD tool to find LUT+FF pairs in netlist -->
<pack_pattern name="ble4" in_port="lut4.out" out_port="ff.D"/>
</direct>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble4.clk" output="ff.clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff.Q lut4.out" output="ble4.out">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="lut4.out" out_port="ble4.out"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff.Q" out_port="ble4.out"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in" output="ble4.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="ble4.out" output="fle.out[0:0]"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="ble4.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- 6-LUT mode definition end -->
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<!-- We use a full crossbar to get logical equivalence at inputs of CLB
The delays below come from Stratix IV. the delay through a connection block
input mux + the crossbar in Stratix IV is 167 ps. We already have a 72 ps
delay on the connection block input mux (modeled by Ian Kuon), so the remaining
delay within the crossbar is 95 ps.
The delays of cluster feedbacks in Stratix IV is 100 ps, when driven by a LUT.
Since all our outputs LUT outputs go to a BLE output, and have a delay of
25 ps to do so, we subtract 25 ps from the 100 ps delay of a feedback
to get the part that should be marked on the crossbar. -->
<complete name="crossbar" input="clb.I fle[3:0].out" output="fle[3:0].in">
<delay_constant max="95e-12" in_port="clb.I" out_port="fle[3:0].in"/>
<delay_constant max="75e-12" in_port="fle[3:0].out" out_port="fle[3:0].in"/>
</complete>
<complete name="clks" input="clb.clk" output="fle[3:0].clk">
</complete>
<!-- This way of specifying direct connection to clb outputs is important because this architecture uses automatic spreading of opins.
By grouping to output pins in this fashion, if a logic block is completely filled by 6-LUTs,
then the outputs those 6-LUTs take get evenly distributed across all four sides of the CLB instead of clumped on two sides (which is what happens with a more
naive specification).
-->
<direct name="clbouts1" input="fle[3:0].out[0:0]" output="clb.O[3:0]"/>
<direct name="clbouts2" input="fle[3:0].out[1:1]" output="clb.O[7:4]"/>
</interconnect>
<!-- Every input pin is driven by 15% of the tracks in a channel, every output pin is driven by 10% of the tracks in a channel -->
<!-- Place this general purpose logic block in any unspecified column -->
</pb_type>
<!-- Define general purpose logic block (CLB) ends -->
</complexblocklist>
</architecture>

449
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k4_frac_N4_tileable_40nm.xml Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
<!--
Flagship Heterogeneous Architecture (No Carry Chains) for VTR 7.0.
- 40 nm technology
- General purpose logic block:
K = 4, N = 4, fracturable 4 LUTs (can operate as one 4-LUT or two 3-LUTs with all 3 inputs shared)
with optionally registered outputs
- Routing architecture: L = 4, fc_in = 0.15, Fc_out = 0.1
Details on Modelling:
Based on flagship k4_frac_N4_mem32K_40nm.xml architecture.
Authors: Jason Luu, Jeff Goeders, Vaughn Betz
-->
<architecture>
<!--
ODIN II specific config begins
Describes the types of user-specified netlist blocks (in blif, this corresponds to
".model [type_of_block]") that this architecture supports.
Note: Basic LUTs, I/Os, and flip-flops are not included here as there are
already special structures in blif (.names, .input, .output, and .latch)
that describe them.
-->
<models>
<!-- A virtual model for I/O to be used in the physical mode of io block -->
<model name="io">
<input_ports>
<port name="outpad"/>
</input_ports>
<output_ports>
<port name="inpad"/>
</output_ports>
</model>
<!-- A virtual model for I/O to be used in the physical mode of io block -->
<model name="frac_lut4">
<input_ports>
<port name="in"/>
</input_ports>
<output_ports>
<port name="lut3_out"/>
<port name="lut4_out"/>
</output_ports>
</model>
</models>
<tiles>
<!-- Do NOT add clock pins to I/O here!!! VPR does not build clock network in the way that OpenFPGA can support
If you need to register the I/O, define clocks in the circuit models
These clocks can be handled in back-end
-->
<tile name="io" capacity="8" area="0">
<equivalent_sites>
<site pb_type="io"/>
</equivalent_sites>
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
<fc in_type="frac" in_val="0.15" out_type="frac" out_val="0.10"/>
<pinlocations pattern="custom">
<loc side="left">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="top">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="right">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
<loc side="bottom">io.outpad io.inpad</loc>
</pinlocations>
</tile>
<tile name="clb" area="53894">
<equivalent_sites>
<site pb_type="clb"/>
</equivalent_sites>
<input name="I" num_pins="12" equivalent="full"/>
<output name="O" num_pins="8" equivalent="none"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<fc in_type="frac" in_val="0.15" out_type="frac" out_val="0.10"/>
<pinlocations pattern="spread"/>
</tile>
</tiles>
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="6" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM
models. We are modifying the delay values however, to include metal C and R, which allows more architecture
experimentation. We are also modifying the relative resistance of PMOS to be 1.8x that of NMOS
(vs. Ian's 3x) as 1.8x lines up with Jeff G's data from a 45 nm process (and is more typical of
45 nm in general). I'm upping the Rmin_nmos from Ian's just over 6k to nearly 9k, and dropping
RminW_pmos from 18k to 16k to hit this 1.8x ratio, while keeping the delays of buffers approximately
lined up with Stratix IV.
We are using Jeff G.'s capacitance data for 45 nm (in tech/ptm_45nm).
Jeff's tables list C in for transistors with widths in multiples of the minimum feature size (45 nm).
The minimum contactable transistor is 2.5 * 45 nm, so I need to multiply drive strength sizes in this file
by 2.5x when looking up in Jeff's tables.
The delay values are lined up with Stratix IV, which has an architecture similar to this
proposed FPGA, and which is also 40 nm
C_ipin_cblock: input capacitance of a track buffer, which VPR assumes is a single-stage
4x minimum drive strength buffer. -->
<sizing R_minW_nmos="8926" R_minW_pmos="16067"/>
<!-- The grid_logic_tile_area below will be used for all blocks that do not explicitly set their own (non-routing)
area; set to 0 since we explicitly set the area of all blocks currently in this architecture file.
-->
<area grid_logic_tile_area="0"/>
<chan_width_distr>
<x distr="uniform" peak="1.000000"/>
<y distr="uniform" peak="1.000000"/>
</chan_width_distr>
<switch_block type="wilton" fs="3" sub_type="subset" sub_fs="3"/>
<connection_block input_switch_name="ipin_cblock"/>
</device>
<switchlist>
<!-- VB: the mux_trans_size and buf_size data below is in minimum width transistor *areas*, assuming the purple
book area formula. This means the mux transistors are about 5x minimum drive strength.
We assume the first stage of the buffer is 3x min drive strength to be reasonable given the large
mux transistors, and this gives a reasonable stage ratio of a bit over 5x to the second stage. We assume
the n and p transistors in the first stage are equal-sized to lower the buffer trip point, since it's fed
by a pass transistor mux. We can then reverse engineer the buffer second stage to hit the specified
buf_size (really buffer area) - 16.2x minimum drive nmos and 1.8*16.2 = 29.2x minimum drive.
I then took the data from Jeff G.'s PTM modeling of 45 nm to get the Cin (gate of first stage) and Cout
(diff of second stage) listed below. Jeff's models are in tech/ptm_45nm, and are in min feature multiples.
The minimum contactable transistor is 2.5 * 45 nm, so I need to multiply the drive strength sizes above by
2.5x when looking up in Jeff's tables.
Finally, we choose a switch delay (58 ps) that leads to length 4 wires having a delay equal to that of SIV of 126 ps.
This also leads to the switch being 46% of the total wire delay, which is reasonable. -->
<switch type="mux" name="0" R="551" Cin=".77e-15" Cout="4e-15" Tdel="58e-12" mux_trans_size="2.630740" buf_size="27.645901"/>
<!--switch ipin_cblock resistance set to yeild for 4x minimum drive strength buffer-->
<switch type="mux" name="ipin_cblock" R="2231.5" Cout="0." Cin="1.47e-15" Tdel="7.247000e-11" mux_trans_size="1.222260" buf_size="auto"/>
</switchlist>
<segmentlist>
<!--- VB & JL: using ITRS metal stack data, 96 nm half pitch wires, which are intermediate metal width/space.
With the 96 nm half pitch, such wires would take 60 um of height, vs. a 90 nm high (approximated as square) Stratix IV tile so this seems
reasonable. Using a tile length of 90 nm, corresponding to the length of a Stratix IV tile if it were square. -->
<!-- GIVE a specific name for the segment! OpenFPGA appreciate that! -->
<segment name="L4" freq="1.000000" length="4" type="unidir" Rmetal="101" Cmetal="22.5e-15">
<mux name="0"/>
<sb type="pattern">1 1 1 1 1</sb>
<cb type="pattern">1 1 1 1</cb>
</segment>
</segmentlist>
<complexblocklist>
<!-- Define I/O pads begin -->
<!-- Capacity is a unique property of I/Os, it is the maximum number of I/Os that can be placed at the same (X,Y) location on the FPGA -->
<!-- Not sure of the area of an I/O (varies widely), and it's not relevant to the design of the FPGA core, so we're setting it to 0. -->
<pb_type name="io">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Do NOT add clock pins to I/O here!!! VPR does not build clock network in the way that OpenFPGA can support
If you need to register the I/O, define clocks in the circuit models
These clocks can be handled in back-end
-->
<!-- A mode denotes the physical implementation of an I/O
This mode will be not packable but is mainly used for fabric verilog generation
-->
<mode name="physical" disabled_in_pack="true">
<pb_type name="iopad" blif_model=".subckt io" num_pb="1">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="outpad" input="io.outpad" output="iopad.outpad">
<delay_constant max="1.394e-11" in_port="io.outpad" out_port="iopad.outpad"/>
</direct>
<direct name="inpad" input="iopad.inpad" output="io.inpad">
<delay_constant max="4.243e-11" in_port="iopad.inpad" out_port="io.inpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- IOs can operate as either inputs or outputs.
Delays below come from Ian Kuon. They are small, so they should be interpreted as
the delays to and from registers in the I/O (and generally I/Os are registered
today and that is when you timing analyze them.
-->
<mode name="inpad">
<pb_type name="inpad" blif_model=".input" num_pb="1">
<output name="inpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="inpad" input="inpad.inpad" output="io.inpad">
<delay_constant max="4.243e-11" in_port="inpad.inpad" out_port="io.inpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<mode name="outpad">
<pb_type name="outpad" blif_model=".output" num_pb="1">
<input name="outpad" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="outpad" input="io.outpad" output="outpad.outpad">
<delay_constant max="1.394e-11" in_port="io.outpad" out_port="outpad.outpad"/>
</direct>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Every input pin is driven by 15% of the tracks in a channel, every output pin is driven by 10% of the tracks in a channel -->
<!-- IOs go on the periphery of the FPGA, for consistency,
make it physically equivalent on all sides so that only one definition of I/Os is needed.
If I do not make a physically equivalent definition, then I need to define 4 different I/Os, one for each side of the FPGA
-->
<!-- Place I/Os on the sides of the FPGA -->
<power method="ignore"/>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define I/O pads ends -->
<!-- Define general purpose logic block (CLB) begin -->
<!--- Area calculation: Total Stratix IV tile area is about 8100 um^2, and a minimum width transistor
area is 60 L^2 yields a tile area of 84375 MWTAs.
Routing at W=300 is 30481 MWTAs, leaving us with a total of 53000 MWTAs for logic block area
This means that only 37% of our area is in the general routing, and 63% is inside the logic
block. Note that the crossbar / local interconnect is considered part of the logic block
area in this analysis. That is a lower proportion of of routing area than most academics
assume, but note that the total routing area really includes the crossbar, which would push
routing area up significantly, we estimate into the ~70% range.
-->
<pb_type name="clb">
<input name="I" num_pins="12" equivalent="full"/>
<output name="O" num_pins="8" equivalent="none"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Describe fracturable logic element.
Each fracturable logic element has a 6-LUT that can alternatively operate as two 5-LUTs with shared inputs.
The outputs of the fracturable logic element can be optionally registered
-->
<pb_type name="fle" num_pb="4">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Physical mode definition begin (physical implementation of the fle) -->
<mode name="physical" disabled_in_pack="true">
<pb_type name="fabric" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<pb_type name="frac_logic" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<!-- Define LUT -->
<pb_type name="frac_lut4" blif_model=".subckt frac_lut4" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="lut3_out" num_pins="2"/>
<output name="lut4_out" num_pins="1"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="frac_logic.in" output="frac_lut4.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="frac_lut4.lut3_out[1]" output="frac_logic.out[1]"/>
<!-- Xifan Tang: I use out[0] because the output of lut6 in lut6 mode is wired to the out[0] -->
<mux name="mux1" input="frac_lut4.lut4_out frac_lut4.lut3_out[0]" output="frac_logic.out[0]"/>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="2" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fabric.in" output="frac_logic.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="frac_logic.out[1:0]" output="ff[1:0].D"/>
<complete name="direct3" input="fabric.clk" output="ff[1:0].clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff[0].Q frac_logic.out[0]" output="fabric.out[0]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="frac_logic.out[0]" out_port="fabric.out[0]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[0].Q" out_port="fabric.out[0]"/>
</mux>
<mux name="mux2" input="ff[1].Q frac_logic.out[1]" output="fabric.out[1]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="frac_logic.out[1]" out_port="fabric.out[1]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[1].Q" out_port="fabric.out[1]"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in" output="fabric.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="fabric.out" output="fle.out"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="fabric.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Physical mode definition end (physical implementation of the fle) -->
<!-- Dual 3-LUT mode definition begin -->
<mode name="n2_lut3">
<pb_type name="lut3inter" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="3"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="2"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<pb_type name="ble3" num_pb="2">
<input name="in" num_pins="3"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Define the LUT -->
<pb_type name="lut3" blif_model=".names" num_pb="1" class="lut">
<input name="in" num_pins="3" port_class="lut_in"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1" port_class="lut_out"/>
<!-- LUT timing using delay matrix -->
<!-- These are the physical delay inputs on a Stratix IV LUT but because VPR cannot do LUT rebalancing,
we instead take the average of these numbers to get more stable results
82e-12
173e-12
261e-12
263e-12
398e-12
-->
<delay_matrix type="max" in_port="lut3.in" out_port="lut3.out">
235e-12
235e-12
235e-12
</delay_matrix>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define the flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="1" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="ble3.in[2:0]" output="lut3[0:0].in[2:0]"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3[0:0].out" output="ff[0:0].D">
<!-- Advanced user option that tells CAD tool to find LUT+FF pairs in netlist -->
<pack_pattern name="ble3" in_port="lut3[0:0].out" out_port="ff[0:0].D"/>
</direct>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble3.clk" output="ff[0:0].clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff[0:0].Q lut3.out[0:0]" output="ble3.out[0:0]">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="lut3.out[0:0]" out_port="ble3.out[0:0]"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff[0:0].Q" out_port="ble3.out[0:0]"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="lut3inter.in" output="ble3[0:0].in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3inter.in" output="ble3[1:1].in"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble3[1:0].out" output="lut3inter.out"/>
<complete name="complete1" input="lut3inter.clk" output="ble3[1:0].clk"/>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in[2:0]" output="lut3inter.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut3inter.out" output="fle.out"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="lut3inter.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- Dual 3-LUT mode definition end -->
<!-- 4-LUT mode definition begin -->
<mode name="n1_lut4">
<!-- Define 4-LUT mode -->
<pb_type name="ble4" num_pb="1">
<input name="in" num_pins="4"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1"/>
<!-- Define LUT -->
<pb_type name="lut4" blif_model=".names" num_pb="1" class="lut">
<input name="in" num_pins="4" port_class="lut_in"/>
<output name="out" num_pins="1" port_class="lut_out"/>
<!-- LUT timing using delay matrix -->
<!-- These are the physical delay inputs on a Stratix IV LUT but because VPR cannot do LUT rebalancing,
we instead take the average of these numbers to get more stable results
82e-12
173e-12
261e-12
263e-12
398e-12
397e-12
-->
<delay_matrix type="max" in_port="lut4.in" out_port="lut4.out">
261e-12
261e-12
261e-12
261e-12
</delay_matrix>
</pb_type>
<!-- Define flip-flop -->
<pb_type name="ff" blif_model=".latch" num_pb="1" class="flipflop">
<input name="D" num_pins="1" port_class="D"/>
<output name="Q" num_pins="1" port_class="Q"/>
<clock name="clk" num_pins="1" port_class="clock"/>
<T_setup value="66e-12" port="ff.D" clock="clk"/>
<T_clock_to_Q max="124e-12" port="ff.Q" clock="clk"/>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="ble4.in" output="lut4[0:0].in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="lut4.out" output="ff.D">
<!-- Advanced user option that tells CAD tool to find LUT+FF pairs in netlist -->
<pack_pattern name="ble4" in_port="lut4.out" out_port="ff.D"/>
</direct>
<direct name="direct3" input="ble4.clk" output="ff.clk"/>
<mux name="mux1" input="ff.Q lut4.out" output="ble4.out">
<!-- LUT to output is faster than FF to output on a Stratix IV -->
<delay_constant max="25e-12" in_port="lut4.out" out_port="ble4.out"/>
<delay_constant max="45e-12" in_port="ff.Q" out_port="ble4.out"/>
</mux>
</interconnect>
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<direct name="direct1" input="fle.in" output="ble4.in"/>
<direct name="direct2" input="ble4.out" output="fle.out[0:0]"/>
<direct name="direct3" input="fle.clk" output="ble4.clk"/>
</interconnect>
</mode>
<!-- 6-LUT mode definition end -->
</pb_type>
<interconnect>
<!-- We use a full crossbar to get logical equivalence at inputs of CLB
The delays below come from Stratix IV. the delay through a connection block
input mux + the crossbar in Stratix IV is 167 ps. We already have a 72 ps
delay on the connection block input mux (modeled by Ian Kuon), so the remaining
delay within the crossbar is 95 ps.
The delays of cluster feedbacks in Stratix IV is 100 ps, when driven by a LUT.
Since all our outputs LUT outputs go to a BLE output, and have a delay of
25 ps to do so, we subtract 25 ps from the 100 ps delay of a feedback
to get the part that should be marked on the crossbar. -->
<complete name="crossbar" input="clb.I fle[3:0].out" output="fle[3:0].in">
<delay_constant max="95e-12" in_port="clb.I" out_port="fle[3:0].in"/>
<delay_constant max="75e-12" in_port="fle[3:0].out" out_port="fle[3:0].in"/>
</complete>
<complete name="clks" input="clb.clk" output="fle[3:0].clk">
</complete>
<!-- This way of specifying direct connection to clb outputs is important because this architecture uses automatic spreading of opins.
By grouping to output pins in this fashion, if a logic block is completely filled by 6-LUTs,
then the outputs those 6-LUTs take get evenly distributed across all four sides of the CLB instead of clumped on two sides (which is what happens with a more
naive specification).
-->
<direct name="clbouts1" input="fle[3:0].out[0:0]" output="clb.O[3:0]"/>
<direct name="clbouts2" input="fle[3:0].out[1:1]" output="clb.O[7:4]"/>
</interconnect>
<!-- Every input pin is driven by 15% of the tracks in a channel, every output pin is driven by 10% of the tracks in a channel -->
<!-- Place this general purpose logic block in any unspecified column -->
</pb_type>
<!-- Define general purpose logic block (CLB) ends -->
</complexblocklist>
</architecture>

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_40nm.xml
View File

@ -77,7 +77,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -85,7 +91,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_40nm.xml
View File

@ -160,7 +160,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="6" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -168,7 +174,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm.xml
View File

@ -194,7 +194,16 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="5" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -205,7 +214,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_40nm.xml
View File

@ -77,7 +77,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -85,7 +91,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_40nm.xml
View File

@ -160,7 +160,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -168,7 +174,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm.xml
View File

@ -194,7 +194,16 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="3x2" width="5" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -205,7 +214,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

14
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_aib_40nm.xml
View File

@ -224,7 +224,18 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="10"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="1"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
<!-- Single instance of an AIB interface -->
<single type="aib" x="4" y="1" priority="20"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="3x4" width="5" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="10"/>
@ -237,7 +248,6 @@
<!-- Single instance of an AIB interface -->
<single type="aib" x="4" y="1" priority="20"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

15
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_multi_io_capacity_40nm.xml
View File

@ -225,7 +225,19 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<row type="io_top" starty="H-1" priority="100"/>
<row type="io_bottom" starty="0" priority="100"/>
<col type="io_left" startx="0" priority="100"/>
<col type="io_right" startx="W-1" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="3x2" width="5" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<row type="io_top" starty="H-1" priority="100"/>
@ -239,7 +251,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

15
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_mem16K_reduced_io_40nm.xml
View File

@ -194,7 +194,18 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="10"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="1"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
<row type="EMPTY" starty="H-1" priority="11"/>
<row type="EMPTY" starty="0" priority="11"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="3x2" width="5" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="10"/>
@ -206,9 +217,7 @@
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
<row type="EMPTY" starty="H-1" priority="11"/>
<row type="EMPTY" starty="0" priority="11"/>
<!-- Single instance of an AIB interface -->
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_chain_wide_mem16K_40nm.xml
View File

@ -194,7 +194,16 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="false">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="6" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -205,7 +214,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_chain_40nm.xml
View File

@ -164,7 +164,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -172,7 +178,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_scan_chain_40nm.xml
View File

@ -179,7 +179,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -187,7 +193,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

11
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_scan_chain_depop50_spypad_40nm.xml
View File

@ -187,7 +187,15 @@
This is strongly recommended if you want to PnR large FPGA fabric
-->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!-- Use the clb with spypad at [1,1] by setting a higher priority -->
<single type="clb_spypad" x="1" y="1" priority="11"/>
</auto_layout>
<!-- Apply a fixed layout of 2x2 core array.
VPR8 considers the I/O ring in the array size
Therefore the height and width are both 4
@ -201,7 +209,6 @@
<!-- Use the clb with spypad at [1,1] by setting a higher priority -->
<single type="clb_spypad" x="1" y="1" priority="11"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<sizing R_minW_nmos="8926" R_minW_pmos="16067"/>

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_adder_register_scan_chain_mem16K_depop50_12nm.xml
View File

@ -184,7 +184,16 @@
This is strongly recommended if you want to PnR large FPGA fabric
-->
<layout tileable="true">
<!-- auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0" -->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="16" starty="1" repeatx="16" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="16" repeatx="16" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout-->
<!-- Apply a fixed layout of 2x2 core array.
VPR8 considers the I/O ring in the array size
Therefore the height and width are both 4
@ -199,7 +208,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="16" starty="1" repeatx="16" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="16" repeatx="16" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!--/auto_layout-->
</layout>
<device>
<sizing R_minW_nmos="8926" R_minW_pmos="16067"/>

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_thru_channel_adder_chain_mem16K_40nm.xml
View File

@ -201,7 +201,16 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="5" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -212,7 +221,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

12
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N10_tileable_thru_channel_adder_chain_wide_mem16K_40nm.xml
View File

@ -194,7 +194,16 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true" through_channel="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
<!--Column of 'memory' with 'EMPTY' blocks wherever a 'memory' does not fit. Vertical offset by 1 for perimeter.-->
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="4x4" width="6" height="6">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -205,7 +214,6 @@
<col type="memory" startx="2" starty="1" repeatx="8" priority="20"/>
<col type="EMPTY" startx="2" repeatx="8" starty="1" priority="19"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM

9
openfpga_flow/vpr_arch/k6_frac_N8_tileable_40nm.xml
View File

@ -77,7 +77,13 @@
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
<layout tileable="true">
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
<auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</auto_layout>
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
@ -85,7 +91,6 @@
<!--Fill with 'clb'-->
<fill type="clb" priority="10"/>
</fixed_layout>
<!-- /auto_layout -->
</layout>
<device>
<!-- VB & JL: Using Ian Kuon's transistor sizing and drive strength data for routing, at 40 nm. Ian used BPTM