start debugging tileable routing using larger array size. Bug spotted in finding chan nodes
This commit is contained in:
parent
682b667a3c
commit
2ff2d65e58
|
@ -159,9 +159,9 @@
|
||||||
</tiles>
|
</tiles>
|
||||||
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
|
<!-- ODIN II specific config ends -->
|
||||||
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
|
<!-- Physical descriptions begin -->
|
||||||
<layout tileable="false">
|
<layout tileable="true">
|
||||||
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
|
<!--auto_layout aspect_ratio="1.0"-->
|
||||||
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="3" height="4">
|
<fixed_layout name="2x2" width="4" height="4">
|
||||||
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
|
<!--Perimeter of 'io' blocks with 'EMPTY' blocks at corners-->
|
||||||
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
|
<perimeter type="io" priority="100"/>
|
||||||
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
|
<corners type="EMPTY" priority="101"/>
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -444,6 +444,10 @@ bool RRGSB::is_sb_node_passing_wire(const RRGraph& rr_graph,
|
||||||
/* Reach here it means that this will be a passing wire,
|
/* Reach here it means that this will be a passing wire,
|
||||||
* we should be able to find the node on the opposite side of the GSB!
|
* we should be able to find the node on the opposite side of the GSB!
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (true != is_sb_node_exist_opposite_side(rr_graph, track_node, node_side)) {
|
||||||
|
VTR_LOG("GSB[%lu][%lu] track node:\n", get_x(), get_y());
|
||||||
|
rr_graph.print_node(track_node);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
VTR_ASSERT (true == is_sb_node_exist_opposite_side(rr_graph, track_node, node_side));
|
VTR_ASSERT (true == is_sb_node_exist_opposite_side(rr_graph, track_node, node_side));
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return true;
|
return true;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue