The correct syntax is already suggested due to the return
value used.
While at it, apply some minor code improvements.
Change-Id: I676e2ebf5714c850a436854a32c2e9d2f181d537
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <dev@zapb.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7999
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Presently, we only look at the Part Number field of the CPUID, and
completely ignore the Implmentor field, simply assuming it to be ARM.
Parts have since been found, with different implementors, that use
overlapping part numbers, causing detection to fail.
Expand the "part number" field to be a full implementor+part number,
excluding the revision/patch fields, to make checking more reliable.
Change-Id: Id81774f829104f57a0c105320d0d2e479fa01522
Signed-off-by: Karl Palsson <karlp@tweak.au>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7845
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Trying to disable OTP write protection by running e.g. `flash protect
1 0 1 off` would already be rejected with an error code, but that would
result in a generic "failed setting protection for blocks 0 to 1"
message. Now a more specific error message is also printed, telling the
user why it failed.
Change-Id: I6d4974eb0bcd23a0a6cf68ff955d9e59b8b1b06a
Signed-off-by: Matthijs Kooijman <matthijs@stdin.nl>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7615
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
With the old checkpatch we cannot use the correct format for the
SPDX tags in the file .c, in fact the C99 comments are not allowed
and we had to use the block comment.
With the new checkpatch, let's switch to the correct SPDX format.
Change created automatically through the command:
sed -i \
's,^/\* *\(SPDX-License-Identifier: .*[^ ]\) *\*/$,// \1,' \
$(find src/ contrib/ -name \*.c)
Change-Id: I6da16506baa7af718947562505dd49606d124171
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7153
Tested-by: jenkins
When printing memory sizes standard ISO 80000-1 prefixes should be used.
Also a space should be added between any number and its unit according
to papers publication rules.
Change-Id: Id1d35e210766b55c201de4e80ac165d8d0414d0a
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6416
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Replace the FSF boilerplate with the SPDX tag.
The SPDX tag on files *.c is incorrect, as it should use the C99
single line comment using '//'. But current checkpatch doesn't
allow C99 comments, so keep using standard C comments, by now.
Change-Id: Ic7db91fe37d1139d42c99e303b3243b6c8fe3ea2
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/7067
Tested-by: jenkins
Some of STM32 flash drivers read Cortex-M part number from
cortex_m->core_info.
In corner cases the core_info pointer was observed uninitialised
even if target_was_examined() returned true. See also [1]
Use the new and safe helper to get Cortex-M part number.
While on it switch also target_to_cm()/target_to_armv7m() to the safe
versions. This prevents a crash when the flash bank is misconfigured
with non-Cortex-M target.
Add missing checks for target_was_examined() to flash probes.
[1] 6545: fix crash in case cortex_m->core_info is not set
https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6545
Change-Id: If2471af74ebfe22f14442f48ae109b2e1bb5fa3b
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Fixes: f5898bd93f (flash/stm32fxx.c: do not read CPUID as this info is stored in cortex_m_common)
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6752
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
This commit corrects the erase function for stm32f2x when dealing with
sectors in bank 2, for STM32F42x/43x devices with 1MB flash.
On STM32F42x/43x with 1MB flash in dual bank configuration, the sector
numbering is not consecutive. The last sector in bank 1 is number 7, and
the first sector in bank 2 is number 12.
The sector indices used by openocd, however, _are_ consecutive (0 to 15
in this case). The arguments "first" and "last" to stm32x_erase() are of
this type, and so the logic surrounding sector numbers needed to be
corrected.
Since the two banks in dual bank mode have the same number of sectors, a
sector index in bank 2 is larger than or equal to half the total number
of sectors.
Change-Id: I15260f8a86d9002769a1ae1c40ebdf62142dae18
Signed-off-by: Simon Johansson <ampleyfly@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6810
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
Just to avoid name clash when comparing documentation with
registered commands through scripts.
Change-Id: I8832545d8d9236ea5dabe6e73732f51e5246caff
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6717
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Tested-by: jenkins
Remove useless setting of the 'is_erased' flag after a flash
modification. Also, remove code that erroneously depends on
this flag.
Keep the flag for now since it is still used by the
erase_check() functionality.
See commit 07da3b3913
Change-Id: Ia046905bc9e0cb2572145f19251c3e10c4e2d553
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <dev@zapb.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6279
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
There are more than 1000 NULL comparisons to be aligned to the
coding style.
For recurrent NULL comparison it's preferable using trivial
scripts in order to minimize the review effort.
Patch generated automatically with the command:
sed -i PATTERN $(find src/ -type f)
where PATTERN is in the list:
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) == NULL)/(!\1)/g'
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*->[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) == NULL)/(!\1)/g'
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\.[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) == NULL)/(!\1)/g'
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) != NULL)/(\1)/g'
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*->[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) != NULL)/(\1)/g'
's/(\([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\.[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\) != NULL)/(\1)/g'
's/(NULL == \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(!\1)/g'
's/(NULL == \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*->[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(!\1)/g'
's/(NULL == \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\.[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(!\1)/g'
's/(NULL != \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(\1)/g'
's/(NULL != \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*->[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(\1)/g'
's/(NULL != \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\.[a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(\1)/g'
Change-Id: Ida103e325d6d0600fb69c0b7a1557ee969db4417
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6350
Tested-by: jenkins
There are ~900 Yoda conditions to be aligned to the coding style.
For recurrent Yoda conditions it's preferable using a trivial
script in order to minimize the review effort.
E.g. comparison of uppercase macro/enum with lowercase variable:
- ...(ERROR_OK == retval)...
+ ...(retval == ERROR_OK)...
Patch generated automatically with the command:
sed -i \
's/(\([A-Z][A-Z0-9_]*\) \([=!]=\) \([a-z][a-z0-9_]*\))/(\3 \2 \1)/g' \
$(find src/ -type f)
While there, remove the braces {} around a single statement block
to prevent warning from checkpatch.
Change-Id: If585b0a4b4578879c87b2dd74d9e0025e275ec6b
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6354
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Xiang W <wxjstz@126.com>
In these drivers we read CPUID to check the Cortex-M PARTNO,
but now the PARTNO is stored in struct cortex_m_common.core_info.
Change-Id: I5bb3b95210ab6e23b8e1252686dd81015740bf68
Signed-off-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6240
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
1) The API of "info" callback in "struct flash_driver" has been
improved. Fixed buffers for strings
2) Removed the calls to snprintf() from the flash_driver.info
implementations. Many of them were used in an unsafe manner
(buffer overruns were possible).
Change-Id: I42ab8a8018d01f9af43c5ba49f650c3cb5d31dcb
Signed-off-by: Jan Matyas <matyas@codasip.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6182
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
The function free() can be called with a NULL pointer as argument,
no need to check the argument before. If the pointer is NULL, no
operation is performed by free().
Remove the occurrences of pattern:
if (ptr)
free(ptr);
There are cases where the pointer is set to NULL after free(), but
then re-assigned within few lines. Drop the setting to NULL when
this is evident. Anyway, the compiler will remove the useless
assignment so no reason to be too much aggressive in this change.
Change-Id: I55b2ce7cbe201410016398933e34d33a4b66e30b
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5811
Tested-by: jenkins
Change-Id: I677bc4487fc2eff2c32e14ca2db5470fddaa63b5
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5778
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Fix typos and duplicated words in comments and strings.
Change-Id: I64282c7018462deefeeb8e5f4d0d81942425b3fc
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5758
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
* use proper type codes
* add 0x in front of hex values
* remove some concatenated empty strings
Change-Id: I77e8dd161887f02ecf8019b43d3e8e7cc122ad0e
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5780
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Use 'unsigned int' and 'bool' instead of 'int' where appropriate.
While at it, fix some coding style issues.
No new Clang analyzer warnings.
Change-Id: I700802c9ee81c3c7ae73108f0f8f06b15a4345f8
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <dev@zapb.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4929
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
The current code assumes an STM32's flash bank is laid-out in either of
two configurations:
- 4 x 16kB + 1 x 64kB + n x 128kB
- 4 x 32kB + 1 x 128kB + n x 256kB
This is quite ad-hoc but works fine in practice, as long as there are at
least 5 sectors (if n=0). Unfortunately, some newer STM32s are shipping
with only 64 kB of flash (4 x 16kB sectors).
This patch still assumes the same sector layout, but only keeps adding
sectors to the bank if the bank's capacity has not been reached. This
prevents openocd from crashing on some newer STM32s.
Change-Id: If00e5d7a328d11b399babc0bb2111e3ad8a3217e
Signed-off-by: Romain Goyet <romain.goyet@numworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4926
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Using a signed variable as a parameter of FLASH_SNB() macro
generated "warning: The result of the left shift is undefined
because the left operand is negative"
Change-Id: I8b3fe840f9308962460906097df6ddd848c07b25
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5356
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
To prepare for handling TCL return values consistently, all calls
to command_print/command_print_sameline should switch to CMD as
first parameter.
Change prototype of command_print() and command_print_sameline()
to pass CMD instead of CMD_CTX.
Since the first parameter is currently not used, the change can be
done though scripts without manual coding.
This patch is created using the command:
sed -i PATTERN $(find src/ doc/ -type f)
with all the following patters:
's/\(command_print(cmd\)->ctx,/\1,/'
's/\(command_print(CMD\)_CTX,/\1,/'
's/\(command_print(struct command_\)context \*context,/\1invocation *cmd,/'
's/\(command_print_sameline(cmd\)->ctx,/\1,/'
's/\(command_print_sameline(CMD\)_CTX,/\1,/'
's/\(command_print_sameline(struct command_\)context \*context,/\1invocation *cmd,/'
This change is inspired by http://openocd.zylin.com/1815 from Paul
Fertser but is now done through scripting.
Change-Id: I3386d8f96cdc477e7a2308dd18269de3bed04385
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5081
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Instances of struct flash_driver are never written to at runtime. For a
small amount of memory saving and also robustness (fewer things for
stray pointer writes to hit), mark them const.
Change-Id: Iadbbbc2fac0976d892699200000c5f02856729f3
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4803
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Matthias Welwarsky <matthias@welwarsky.de>
The OTP is part of the flash memory. It has 512 (1024 for F7) bytes
and is organized in 16 sectors with 32 (64 for F7) bytes each.
The OTP is exposed as separate flash bank 1 and can be used
with the usual flash commands.
Writing the OTP can be done as follows:
> stm32f2x otp 1 enable
> flash write bank 1 foo.bin 0
> mdw 0x1fff7800 4
> verify_image foo.bin 0x1fff7800
> stm32f2x otp 1 disable
Note: This patch is largely a rebase/cleanup of a patch
from 2012 by Laurent Charpentier and he did most of the work.
No new Clang-Analyzer warnings.
Change-Id: I5e6371f6a7c7a9929c1d7907d6ba4724f9d20d97
Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/829
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <openocd@codyps.com>
Change-Id: Ia0169514d494bae2a98d92ebc97c8eccc10bc6c4
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4657
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
On a specific early-return path, an allocated working area was not
freed. Free it.
Change-Id: I7c8fe51ff475f191624086996be1c77251780b77
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4520
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Flash operation errors that occur during algorithm programming are
reported via the algorithm return value. However, Flash operation
errors that occur during non-algorithm work (erasing, programming
without a work area, programming the last non-multiple-of-32-bytes on
an H7, etc.) generally end with a call to stm32x_wait_status_busy,
which reads the status register and clears the error flags but fails
to actually report that something went wrong should an error flag
(other than WRPERR) be set. Return an error status from
stm32x_wait_status_busy in those cases. Correct a log message
accordingly.
Change-Id: I09369ea5f924fe58833aec1f45e52320ab4aaf43
Signed-off-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4519
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Flash loaders refactored to the new style - use generated .inc
instead of hexadecimal machine code in the flash driver source.
Change-Id: If65a2099589e210f9450819b467d67819fd841fc
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4439
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Matthias Welwarsky <matthias@welwarsky.de>
All drivers which simply allocate one driver_priv memory block
per each bank now use default_flash_free_driver_priv()
Change-Id: I425bf4213c3632f02dbe11ab819c31eda9b2db62
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4417
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu@dudau.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Welwarsky <matthias@welwarsky.de>
Theese devices do not have a gap in sector numbering.
The driver translates sectors numbers 12 13... to 16 17... as used on dual
bank flash devices. Therefore erase of sector 12 and above fails with error
'stm32x device protected'
on F413/423.
Drop sector number translation for devices without has_large_mem flag.
Change-Id: I65531c0dfe02e2fd0f3d68f0615e0926e9901391
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4299
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
A protection block comprises two adjacent sectors in dual bank mode.
As there are 64 and 128kB sectors joined in blocks 2 and 8, block size
should be computed as a sum of sector sizes.
Change-Id: Ie915df8cf7ca232c4565d7e0c514c8933e71fdfe
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4271
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Use unsigned constant for left shift operation in order to avoid the
following error with GCC >= 6.0:
../src/flash/nor/stm32f2x.c: In function ‘stm32x_handle_unlock_command’:
../src/flash/nor/stm32f2x.c:1324:67: error: left shift of negative value [-Werror=shift-negative-value]
stm32x_info->option_bytes.optcr2_pcrop = OPTCR2_PCROP_RDP | (~1 << bank->num_sectors);
Change-Id: I0ac082bd0dbb8dc2f61ffff8fdf486ab7962d2e0
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <openocd-dev@marcschink.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4207
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: Anton Fosselius <anton.fosselius@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Esben Haabendal <esbenhaabendal@gmail.com>
IDs for STM32F722, F723, F413 and F423 added, handling of PCROP
for F722/723 and additional nWPRT bits for F413/423 implemented.
The additional protection bit positions for F413/423 conflict
with other options bits for the F7xx variants, additionally the
last two sectors share a common bit.
Protection for F413 and F767/777 now use protection blocks
rather sectors for dealing with protections bits.
Checking for halted state in 'lock' and 'unlock' removed: When
PCROP is activated in F723, halted state is not detected properly,
but lock/unlock sequence is required to disable PCROP.
Tested with STM32F723E-Disco, STM32F413ZH-Nucleo.
Change-Id: Ie6ddab47a9ae8461087d369b4f289b7f9d1e031c
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4045
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Large flash parts time out when unlocking. Mass erase time is specified
as 32 seconds worst case for some parts. Automatic mass erase is
probably not using x8 parallelism, though, but a too large timeout
shouldn't hurt.
Also, use the new define instead of hardcoded timeout when mass
erasing.
Change-Id: Ib5af60d52ed7d53277bfe7176c4c44f79d3a26bc
Signed-off-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3738
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
- added ids for various parts
- rewrite of sector allocation to deal with dual-bank F76x/77x
- single- / dual-bank mode for F76x/77x
- sector protection adapted for F76x/77x in dual-bank mode
- handling of additional option bits (28-31) in FLASH_OPTCR
in options_read and options_write for F42x/43x/469/479/7xx,
options bits 0-1 masked out
- check for sensible value of user_options in options_write
- some #defines clarified, non-needed ones removed
- docs updated (options read, options write)
Change-Id: Ie4db80e60baa7d2663e024ab1f278640b1ce901b
Signed-off-by: Andreas Bolsch <hyphen0break@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3526
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Also make GPL notices consistent according to:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
Change-Id: I84c9df40a774958a7ed91460c5d931cfab9f45ba
Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <openocd-dev@marcschink.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3488
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Freddie Chopin <freddie.chopin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Taken from git://git.ac6.fr/openocd commit e8ed67c42227b7072
STM32F446 (0x434) now is's own case.
Change-Id: I5061db7102b4c923c9f39d3d2f0cc69d29fca0a4
Signed-off-by: Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3375
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Obsolete C source code semicolons were removed using the semantic patch
semicolon/semicolon.cocci, see coccinellery.org
Change-Id: I153b4995a9e028ebaf5f58c947821dc78345a777
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kurz <akurz@blala.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3367
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Add the new STM32F446 mcu with 512 Ko
Tested with a eval board
Change-Id: I0c16ce7d32d249c7634d697815207c20e7f778c4
Signed-off-by: prudhomme.remi@gmail.com
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/2484
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
Do not use buf_set_u32 on integers; they're not buffers.
If using buf_set_u32 on integers, bytes will be exchanged on Big Endian targets.
In this particular case, FLASH_OPTCR was incorrectly written, causing it to often
contain one of these values: 0x00aaaae1, 0x00aaffef, 0x00ffabe1 or 0x00abffe1.
This write-protected the device before flash-programming, causing this command...
flash write_image erase unlock myfile.elf
... to fail, complaining about write-protection.
Repeating the above command would change the OPTCR register each time.
After applying this patch, the OPTCR remains "unchanged".
Change-Id: I73d510fcc2e81a01973ad5c6e1aa22715ebd2743
Signed-off-by: Jens Bauer <jens@gpio.dk>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/2466
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
stm32x_write_options is locking the FLASH_OPTCR register by
writing 0x00000001 to it, which clears the other bits. This
causes problems with subsequent flash operations; the hardware
is probably seeing the write protection bits in the register
set to '0' (protect), causing a WRPERR.
This patch ORs the value of the register with 0x00000001, so that
the only change is the lock bit itself.
Change-Id: I0e3ca9aa6563ce1b57a01fc0faf7563b6b85f620
Signed-off-by: Elliott Partridge <elliott.partridge@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/2155
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>