In current code the current target is overridden whenever
jim_handler_data is not NULL. This happens not only with target
prefixed commands, but also with cti, dap and swo/tpiu prefixed
commands.
While this is not causing any run-time issue, by now, the
behaviour is tricky and makes the code cryptic.
Add a specific field to struct command for the target override so
the content of jim_handler_data can be restricted to command
specific data only (today only cti, dap and swo/tpiu).
Extend the API register_commands() to specify the presence of
either the command data or the override target.
The new API makes obsolete calling command_set_handler_data() to
set jim_handler_data, so remove it.
Change-Id: Icc323faf754b0546a72208f90abd9e68ff2ef52f
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5667
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
While registering a new command, jim accepts a pointer to command's
private data that will be accessible during the command execution.
Today openocd is not consistent and passes different private data
depending on the command, and then even overwrites it:
- "simple" commands (.handler) are registered with their own
struct command pointer as command private data;
- "native" commands (.jim_handler) at root level are registered
with NULL command private data;
- "native" commands (.jim_handler) not at root level are
registered with the struct command pointer of their root command
as command private data but, when executed, the command private
data is overwritten by the value in field jim_handler_data taken
from their struct command.
Uniform the usage of command private data by always set it to the
struct command pointer while registering the new commands.
Note: for multi-word commands only the root command is registered,
so command private data will be set to the struct command of the
root command. This will change later in this series when the full-
name of the command will be registered.
Don't overwrite the command private data, but let the commands that
needs jim_handler_data to get it directly through struct command.
For sake of uniformity, let function command_set_handler_data() to
set the field jim_handler_data also for "group" commands, even if
such value will not be used.
Now Jim_CmdPrivData() always returns a struct command pointer, so
wrap it in the inline function jim_to_command() to gain compile
time check on the returned type.
While there, uniform the code to use the macro Jim_CmdPrivData()
to access the command's private data pointer.
Change-Id: Idba16242ba1f6769341b4030a49cdf35a5278695
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5664
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <linux@rempel-privat.de>
With the removal of old tpiu code, commit 7e6556b3ca ("server:
permit the add_service function to return the created service")
http://openocd.zylin.com/5717/ can be reverted.
Fix also the new calls to add_service().
Change-Id: Ib7f2dfc6a9e829239e20313e0f121911085fdc00
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6031
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Adrian M Negreanu <adrian.negreanu@nxp.com>
Remove all the old tpiu code and replace it with a wrapper that
uses the new commands, prints-out the new commands and informs
about the deprecation.
All the code that handles the deprecated tpiu commands is enclosed
between the comments
/* START_DEPRECATED_TPIU */
and
/* END_DEPRECATED_TPIU */
so will be easy to remove it in the future.
Change-Id: I70b0486770128203b923346382d9a90b8ec08439
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6030
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Adrian M Negreanu <adrian.negreanu@nxp.com>
This is supposed to replace big part of armv7m_trace.[ch], since
TPIU is not only the one implemented in Cortex-M3 and M4.
Change-Id: I7588d16cbefe9cdb371c52fb0aa5cdfb48518804
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/5858
Tested-by: jenkins
Antonio Borneo