go-ethereum/swarm/pss/writeup.md

126 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown

## PSS tests failures explanation
This document aims to explain the changes in https://github.com/ethersphere/go-ethereum/pull/126 and how those changes affect the pss_test.go TestNetwork tests.
### Problem
When running the TestNetwork test, execution sometimes:
* deadlocks
* panics
* failures with wrong result, such as:
```
$ go test -v ./swarm/pss -cpu 4 -run TestNetwork
```
```
--- FAIL: TestNetwork (68.13s)
--- FAIL: TestNetwork/3/10/4/sim (68.13s)
pss_test.go:697: 7 of 10 messages received
pss_test.go:700: 3 messages were not received
FAIL
```
Moreover execution almost always deadlocks with `sim` adapter, and `sock` adapter (when buffer is low), but is mostly stable with `exec` and `tcp` adapters.
### Findings and Fixes
#### 1. Addressing panics
Panics were caused due to concurrent map read/writes and unsynchronised access to shared memory by multiple goroutines. This is visible when running the test with the `-race` flag.
```
go test -race -v ./swarm/pss -cpu 4 -run TestNetwork
1 ==================
2 WARNING: DATA RACE
3 Read at 0x00c424d456a0 by goroutine 1089:
4 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss.(*Pss).forward.func1()
5 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss/pss.go:654 +0x44f
6 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/network.(*Kademlia).eachConn.func1()
7 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/network/kademlia.go:350 +0xc9
8 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pot.(*Pot).eachNeighbour.func1()
9 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pot/pot.go:599 +0x59
...
28
29 Previous write at 0x00c424d456a0 by goroutine 829:
30 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss.(*Pss).Run()
31 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss/pss.go:192 +0x16a
32 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss.(*Pss).Run-fm()
33 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/swarm/pss/pss.go:185 +0x63
34 github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/p2p.(*Peer).startProtocols.func1()
35 /Users/nonsense/code/src/github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/p2p/peer.go:347 +0x8b
...
```
##### Current solution
Adding a mutex around all shared data.
#### 2. Failures with wrong result
The validation phase of the TestNetwork test is done using an RPC subscription:
```
...
triggerChecks := func(trigger chan discover.NodeID, id discover.NodeID, rpcclient *rpc.Client) error {
msgC := make(chan APIMsg)
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Second)
defer cancel()
sub, err := rpcclient.Subscribe(ctx, "pss", msgC, "receive", hextopic)
...
```
By design the RPC uses a subscription buffer with a max length. When this length is reached, the subscription is dropped. The current config value is not suitable for stress tests.
##### Current solution
Increase the max length of the RPC subscription buffer.
```
const (
// Subscriptions are removed when the subscriber cannot keep up.
//
// This can be worked around by supplying a channel with sufficiently sized buffer,
// but this can be inconvenient and hard to explain in the docs. Another issue with
// buffered channels is that the buffer is static even though it might not be needed
// most of the time.
//
// The approach taken here is to maintain a per-subscription linked list buffer
// shrinks on demand. If the buffer reaches the size below, the subscription is
// dropped.
maxClientSubscriptionBuffer = 20000
)
```
#### 3. Deadlocks
Deadlocks are triggered when using:
* `sim` adapter - synchronous, unbuffered channel
* `sock` adapter - asynchronous, buffered channel (when using a 1K buffer)
No deadlocks were triggered when using:
* `tcp` adapter - asynchronous, buffered channel
* `exec` adapter - asynchronous, buffered channel
Ultimately the deadlocks happen due to blocking `pp.Send()` call at:
// attempt to send the message
err := pp.Send(msg)
if err != nil {
log.Debug(fmt.Sprintf("%v: failed forwarding: %v", sendMsg, err))
return true
}
`p2p` request handling is synchronous (as discussed at https://github.com/ethersphere/go-ethereum/issues/130), `pss` is also synchronous, therefore if two nodes happen to be processing a request, while at the same time waiting for response on `pp.Send(msg)`, deadlock occurs.
`pp.Send(msg)` is only blocking when the underlying adapter is blocking (read `sim` or `sock`) or the buffer of the connection is full.
##### Current solution
Make no assumption on the undelying connection, and call `pp.Send` asynchronously in a go-routine.
Alternatively, get rid of the `sim` and `sock` adapters, and use `tcp` adapter for testing.