This is a not-particularly-important "cleanliness" PR. It removes the
last remnants of the `x/exp` package, where we used the `maps.Keys`
function.
The original returned the keys in a slice, but when it became 'native'
the signature changed to return an iterator, so the new idiom is
`slices.Collect(maps.Keys(theMap))`, unless of course the raw iterator
can be used instead.
In some cases, where we previously collect into slice and then sort, we
can now instead do `slices.SortXX` on the iterator instead, making the
code a bit more concise.
This PR might be _slighly_ less optimal, because the original `x/exp`
implementation allocated the slice at the correct size off the bat,
which I suppose the new code won't.
Putting it up for discussion.
---------
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
This pull request removes the destruct flag from the state snapshot to
simplify the code.
Previously, this flag indicated that an account was removed during a
state transition, making all associated storage slots inaccessible.
Because storage deletion can involve a large number of slots, the actual
deletion is deferred until the end of the process, where it is handled
in batches.
With the deprecation of self-destruct in the Cancun fork, storage
deletions are no longer expected. Historically, the largest storage
deletion event in Ethereum was around 15 megabytes—manageable in memory.
In this pull request, the single destruct flag is replaced by a set of
deletion markers for individual storage slots. Each deleted storage slot
will now appear in the Storage set with a nil value.
This change will simplify a lot logics, such as storage accessing,
storage flushing, storage iteration and so on.
This change switches from using the `Hasher` interface to add/query the bloomfilter to implementing it as methods.
This significantly reduces the allocations for Search and Rebloom.
The Go authors updated golang/x/ext to change the function signature of the slices sort method.
It's an entire shitshow now because x/ext is not tagged, so everyone's codebase just
picked a new version that some other dep depends on, causing our code to fail building.
This PR updates the dep on our code too and does all the refactorings to follow upstream...
This PR adds a staleness-check to AccountRLP, before checking the bloom-filter and potentially going directly into the disklayer.
---------
Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
* core/state/snapshot: implement storage iterator
* core/state/snapshot, tests: implement helper function
* core/state/snapshot: fix storage issue
If an account is deleted in the tx_1 but recreated in the tx_2,
the it can happen that in this diff layer, both destructedSet
and storageData records this account. In this case, the storage
iterator should be able to iterate the slots belong to new account
but disable further iteration in deeper layers(belong to old account)
* core/state/snapshot: address peter and martin's comment
* core/state: address comments
* core/state/snapshot: fix test
Martin HS
rjl493456442
Dimitris Apostolou
Marius van der Wijden
Péter Szilágyi
Dan Laine
s7v7nislands
Abirdcfly
Edgar Aroutiounian
Melvin Junhee Woo
Martin Michlmayr