mirror of https://github.com/YosysHQ/yosys.git
smtbmc: Add --track-assumes and --minimize-assumes options
The --track-assumes option makes smtbmc keep track of which assumptions were used by the solver when reaching an unsat case and to output that set of assumptions. This is particularly useful to debug PREUNSAT failures. The --minimize-assumes option can be used in addition to --track-assumes which will cause smtbmc to spend additional solving effort to produce a minimal set of assumptions that are sufficient to cause the unsat result.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e4f11eb0a0
commit
42122e240e
|
@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ keep_going = False
|
|||
check_witness = False
|
||||
detect_loops = False
|
||||
incremental = None
|
||||
track_assumes = False
|
||||
minimize_assumes = False
|
||||
so = SmtOpts()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -189,6 +191,15 @@ def help():
|
|||
--incremental
|
||||
run in incremental mode (experimental)
|
||||
|
||||
--track-assumes
|
||||
track individual assumptions and report a subset of used
|
||||
assumptions that are sufficient for the reported outcome. This
|
||||
can be used to debug PREUNSAT failures as well as to find a
|
||||
smaller set of sufficient assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
--minimize-assumes
|
||||
when using --track-assumes, solve for a minimal set of sufficient assumptions.
|
||||
|
||||
""" + so.helpmsg())
|
||||
|
||||
def usage():
|
||||
|
@ -200,7 +211,8 @@ try:
|
|||
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], so.shortopts + "t:higcm:", so.longopts +
|
||||
["help", "final-only", "assume-skipped=", "smtc=", "cex=", "aig=", "aig-noheader", "yw=", "btorwit=", "presat",
|
||||
"dump-vcd=", "dump-yw=", "dump-vlogtb=", "vlogtb-top=", "dump-smtc=", "dump-all", "noinfo", "append=",
|
||||
"smtc-init", "smtc-top=", "noinit", "binary", "keep-going", "check-witness", "detect-loops", "incremental"])
|
||||
"smtc-init", "smtc-top=", "noinit", "binary", "keep-going", "check-witness", "detect-loops", "incremental",
|
||||
"track-assumes", "minimize-assumes"])
|
||||
except:
|
||||
usage()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -289,6 +301,10 @@ for o, a in opts:
|
|||
elif o == "--incremental":
|
||||
from smtbmc_incremental import Incremental
|
||||
incremental = Incremental()
|
||||
elif o == "--track-assumes":
|
||||
track_assumes = True
|
||||
elif o == "--minimize-assumes":
|
||||
minimize_assumes = True
|
||||
elif so.handle(o, a):
|
||||
pass
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
@ -447,6 +463,9 @@ def get_constr_expr(db, state, final=False, getvalues=False, individual=False):
|
|||
|
||||
smt = SmtIo(opts=so)
|
||||
|
||||
if track_assumes:
|
||||
smt.smt2_options[':produce-unsat-assumptions'] = 'true'
|
||||
|
||||
if noinfo and vcdfile is None and vlogtbfile is None and outconstr is None:
|
||||
smt.produce_models = False
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1497,6 +1516,44 @@ def get_active_assert_map(step, active):
|
|||
|
||||
return assert_map
|
||||
|
||||
assume_enables = {}
|
||||
|
||||
def declare_assume_enables():
|
||||
def recurse(mod, path, key_base=()):
|
||||
for expr, desc in smt.modinfo[mod].assumes.items():
|
||||
enable = f"|assume_enable {len(assume_enables)}|"
|
||||
smt.smt2_assumptions[(expr, key_base)] = enable
|
||||
smt.write(f"(declare-const {enable} Bool)")
|
||||
assume_enables[(expr, key_base)] = (enable, path, desc)
|
||||
|
||||
for cell, submod in smt.modinfo[mod].cells.items():
|
||||
recurse(submod, f"{path}.{cell}", (mod, cell, key_base))
|
||||
|
||||
recurse(topmod, topmod)
|
||||
|
||||
if track_assumes:
|
||||
declare_assume_enables()
|
||||
|
||||
def smt_assert_design_assumes(step):
|
||||
if not track_assumes:
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
if not assume_enables:
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
||||
def expr_for_assume(assume_key, base=None):
|
||||
expr, key_base = assume_key
|
||||
expr_prefix = f"(|{expr}| "
|
||||
expr_suffix = ")"
|
||||
while key_base:
|
||||
mod, cell, key_base = key_base
|
||||
expr_prefix += f"(|{mod}_h {cell}| "
|
||||
expr_suffix += ")"
|
||||
return f"{expr_prefix} s{step}{expr_suffix}"
|
||||
|
||||
for assume_key, (enable, path, desc) in assume_enables.items():
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(f"(=> {enable} {expr_for_assume(assume_key)})")
|
||||
|
||||
states = list()
|
||||
asserts_antecedent_cache = [list()]
|
||||
|
@ -1651,6 +1708,13 @@ def smt_check_sat(expected=["sat", "unsat"]):
|
|||
smt_forall_assert()
|
||||
return smt.check_sat(expected=expected)
|
||||
|
||||
def report_tracked_assumptions(msg):
|
||||
if track_assumes:
|
||||
print_msg(msg)
|
||||
for key in smt.get_unsat_assumptions(minimize=minimize_assumes):
|
||||
enable, path, descr = assume_enables[key]
|
||||
print_msg(f" In {path}: {descr}")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if incremental:
|
||||
incremental.mainloop()
|
||||
|
@ -1664,7 +1728,7 @@ elif tempind:
|
|||
break
|
||||
|
||||
smt_state(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(not (|%s_is| s%d))" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, step))
|
||||
|
@ -1707,6 +1771,7 @@ elif tempind:
|
|||
|
||||
else:
|
||||
print_msg("Temporal induction successful.")
|
||||
report_tracked_assumptions("Used assumptions:")
|
||||
retstatus = "PASSED"
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1732,7 +1797,7 @@ elif covermode:
|
|||
|
||||
while step < num_steps:
|
||||
smt_state(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, step))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1753,6 +1818,7 @@ elif covermode:
|
|||
smt_assert("(distinct (covers_%d s%d) #b%s)" % (coveridx, step, "0" * len(cover_desc)))
|
||||
|
||||
if smt_check_sat() == "unsat":
|
||||
report_tracked_assumptions("Used assumptions:")
|
||||
smt_pop()
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1761,13 +1827,14 @@ elif covermode:
|
|||
print_msg("Appending additional step %d." % i)
|
||||
smt_state(i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(not (|%s_is| s%d))" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_t| s%d s%d)" % (topmod, i-1, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, i))
|
||||
print_msg("Re-solving with appended steps..")
|
||||
if smt_check_sat() == "unsat":
|
||||
print("%s Cannot appended steps without violating assumptions!" % smt.timestamp())
|
||||
report_tracked_assumptions("Conflicting assumptions:")
|
||||
found_failed_assert = True
|
||||
retstatus = "FAILED"
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
@ -1823,7 +1890,7 @@ else: # not tempind, covermode
|
|||
retstatus = "PASSED"
|
||||
while step < num_steps:
|
||||
smt_state(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(step)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, step))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, step))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1853,7 +1920,7 @@ else: # not tempind, covermode
|
|||
if step+i < num_steps:
|
||||
smt_state(step+i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(not (|%s_is| s%d))" % (topmod, step+i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, step+i))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(step + i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, step+i))
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_t| s%d s%d)" % (topmod, step+i-1, step+i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, step+i))
|
||||
|
@ -1867,7 +1934,8 @@ else: # not tempind, covermode
|
|||
print_msg("Checking assumptions in steps %d to %d.." % (step, last_check_step))
|
||||
|
||||
if smt_check_sat() == "unsat":
|
||||
print("%s Assumptions are unsatisfiable!" % smt.timestamp())
|
||||
print_msg("Assumptions are unsatisfiable!")
|
||||
report_tracked_assumptions("Conficting assumptions:")
|
||||
retstatus = "PREUNSAT"
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1920,13 +1988,14 @@ else: # not tempind, covermode
|
|||
print_msg("Appending additional step %d." % i)
|
||||
smt_state(i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(not (|%s_is| s%d))" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent("(|%s_u| s%d)" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_design_assumes(i)
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_h| s%d)" % (topmod, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_antecedent("(|%s_t| s%d s%d)" % (topmod, i-1, i))
|
||||
smt_assert_consequent(get_constr_expr(constr_assumes, i))
|
||||
print_msg("Re-solving with appended steps..")
|
||||
if smt_check_sat() == "unsat":
|
||||
print("%s Cannot append steps without violating assumptions!" % smt.timestamp())
|
||||
print_msg("Cannot append steps without violating assumptions!")
|
||||
report_tracked_assumptions("Conflicting assumptions:")
|
||||
retstatus = "FAILED"
|
||||
break
|
||||
print_anyconsts(step)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -15,6 +15,14 @@ class InteractiveError(Exception):
|
|||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def mkkey(data):
|
||||
if isinstance(data, list):
|
||||
return tuple(map(mkkey, data))
|
||||
elif isinstance(data, dict):
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(f"JSON objects found in assumption key: {data!r}")
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class Incremental:
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.traceidx = 0
|
||||
|
@ -73,17 +81,17 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
|
||||
if min_len is not None and arg_len < min_len:
|
||||
if min_len == max_len:
|
||||
raise (
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(
|
||||
f"{json.dumps(expr[0])} expression must have "
|
||||
f"{min_len} argument{'s' if min_len != 1 else ''}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise (
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(
|
||||
f"{json.dumps(expr[0])} expression must have at least "
|
||||
f"{min_len} argument{'s' if min_len != 1 else ''}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
if max_len is not None and arg_len > max_len:
|
||||
raise (
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(
|
||||
f"{json.dumps(expr[0])} expression can have at most "
|
||||
f"{min_len} argument{'s' if max_len != 1 else ''}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -96,14 +104,31 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
smt_out.append(f"s{step}")
|
||||
return "module", smtbmc.topmod
|
||||
|
||||
def expr_mod_constraint(self, expr, smt_out):
|
||||
self.expr_arg_len(expr, 1)
|
||||
def expr_cell(self, expr, smt_out):
|
||||
self.expr_arg_len(expr, 2)
|
||||
position = len(smt_out)
|
||||
smt_out.append(None)
|
||||
arg_sort = self.expr(expr[1], smt_out, required_sort=["module", None])
|
||||
arg_sort = self.expr(expr[2], smt_out, required_sort=["module", None])
|
||||
smt_out.append(")")
|
||||
module = arg_sort[1]
|
||||
cell = expr[1]
|
||||
submod = smtbmc.smt.modinfo[module].cells.get(cell)
|
||||
if submod is None:
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(f"module {module!r} has no cell {cell!r}")
|
||||
smt_out[position] = f"(|{module}_h {cell}| "
|
||||
return ("module", submod)
|
||||
|
||||
def expr_mod_constraint(self, expr, smt_out):
|
||||
suffix = expr[0][3:]
|
||||
smt_out[position] = f"(|{module}{suffix}| "
|
||||
self.expr_arg_len(expr, 1, 2 if suffix in ["_a", "_u", "_c"] else 1)
|
||||
position = len(smt_out)
|
||||
smt_out.append(None)
|
||||
arg_sort = self.expr(expr[-1], smt_out, required_sort=["module", None])
|
||||
module = arg_sort[1]
|
||||
if len(expr) == 3:
|
||||
smt_out[position] = f"(|{module}{suffix} {expr[1]}| "
|
||||
else:
|
||||
smt_out[position] = f"(|{module}{suffix}| "
|
||||
smt_out.append(")")
|
||||
return "Bool"
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -223,20 +248,19 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
subexpr = expr[2]
|
||||
|
||||
if not isinstance(label, str):
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(f"expression label has to be a string")
|
||||
raise InteractiveError("expression label has to be a string")
|
||||
|
||||
smt_out.append("(! ")
|
||||
smt_out.appedd(label)
|
||||
smt_out.append(" ")
|
||||
|
||||
sort = self.expr(subexpr, smt_out)
|
||||
|
||||
smt_out.append(" :named ")
|
||||
smt_out.append(label)
|
||||
smt_out.append(")")
|
||||
|
||||
return sort
|
||||
|
||||
expr_handlers = {
|
||||
"step": expr_step,
|
||||
"cell": expr_cell,
|
||||
"mod_h": expr_mod_constraint,
|
||||
"mod_is": expr_mod_constraint,
|
||||
"mod_i": expr_mod_constraint,
|
||||
|
@ -302,6 +326,30 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
|
||||
assert_fn(self.expr_smt(cmd.get("expr"), "Bool"))
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_assert_design_assumes(self, cmd):
|
||||
step = self.arg_step(cmd)
|
||||
smtbmc.smt_assert_design_assumes(step)
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_get_design_assume(self, cmd):
|
||||
key = mkkey(cmd.get("key"))
|
||||
return smtbmc.assume_enables.get(key)
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_update_assumptions(self, cmd):
|
||||
expr = cmd.get("expr")
|
||||
key = cmd.get("key")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
key = mkkey(key)
|
||||
|
||||
result = smtbmc.smt.smt2_assumptions.pop(key, None)
|
||||
if expr is not None:
|
||||
expr = self.expr_smt(expr, "Bool")
|
||||
smtbmc.smt.smt2_assumptions[key] = expr
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_get_unsat_assumptions(self, cmd):
|
||||
return smtbmc.smt.get_unsat_assumptions(minimize=bool(cmd.get('minimize')))
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_push(self, cmd):
|
||||
smtbmc.smt_push()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -313,11 +361,14 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
|
||||
def cmd_smtlib(self, cmd):
|
||||
command = cmd.get("command")
|
||||
response = cmd.get("response", False)
|
||||
if not isinstance(command, str):
|
||||
raise InteractiveError(
|
||||
f"raw SMT-LIB command must be a string, found {json.dumps(command)}"
|
||||
)
|
||||
smtbmc.smt.write(command)
|
||||
if response:
|
||||
return smtbmc.smt.read()
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_design_hierwitness(self, cmd=None):
|
||||
allregs = (cmd is None) or bool(cmd.get("allreges", False))
|
||||
|
@ -369,6 +420,21 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
|
||||
return dict(last_step=last_step)
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_modinfo(self, cmd):
|
||||
fields = cmd.get("fields", [])
|
||||
|
||||
mod = cmd.get("mod")
|
||||
if mod is None:
|
||||
mod = smtbmc.topmod
|
||||
modinfo = smtbmc.smt.modinfo.get(mod)
|
||||
if modinfo is None:
|
||||
return None
|
||||
|
||||
result = dict(name=mod)
|
||||
for field in fields:
|
||||
result[field] = getattr(modinfo, field, None)
|
||||
return result
|
||||
|
||||
def cmd_ping(self, cmd):
|
||||
return cmd
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -377,6 +443,10 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
"assert": cmd_assert,
|
||||
"assert_antecedent": cmd_assert,
|
||||
"assert_consequent": cmd_assert,
|
||||
"assert_design_assumes": cmd_assert_design_assumes,
|
||||
"get_design_assume": cmd_get_design_assume,
|
||||
"update_assumptions": cmd_update_assumptions,
|
||||
"get_unsat_assumptions": cmd_get_unsat_assumptions,
|
||||
"push": cmd_push,
|
||||
"pop": cmd_pop,
|
||||
"check": cmd_check,
|
||||
|
@ -384,6 +454,7 @@ class Incremental:
|
|||
"design_hierwitness": cmd_design_hierwitness,
|
||||
"write_yw_trace": cmd_write_yw_trace,
|
||||
"read_yw_trace": cmd_read_yw_trace,
|
||||
"modinfo": cmd_modinfo,
|
||||
"ping": cmd_ping,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ class SmtModInfo:
|
|||
self.clocks = dict()
|
||||
self.cells = dict()
|
||||
self.asserts = dict()
|
||||
self.assumes = dict()
|
||||
self.covers = dict()
|
||||
self.maximize = set()
|
||||
self.minimize = set()
|
||||
|
@ -141,6 +142,7 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
self.recheck = False
|
||||
self.smt2cache = [list()]
|
||||
self.smt2_options = dict()
|
||||
self.smt2_assumptions = dict()
|
||||
self.p = None
|
||||
self.p_index = solvers_index
|
||||
solvers_index += 1
|
||||
|
@ -602,6 +604,12 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
else:
|
||||
self.modinfo[self.curmod].covers["%s_c %s" % (self.curmod, fields[2])] = fields[3]
|
||||
|
||||
if fields[1] == "yosys-smt2-assume":
|
||||
if len(fields) > 4:
|
||||
self.modinfo[self.curmod].assumes["%s_u %s" % (self.curmod, fields[2])] = f'{fields[4]} ({fields[3]})'
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.modinfo[self.curmod].assumes["%s_u %s" % (self.curmod, fields[2])] = fields[3]
|
||||
|
||||
if fields[1] == "yosys-smt2-maximize":
|
||||
self.modinfo[self.curmod].maximize.add(fields[2])
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -785,8 +793,13 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
return stmt
|
||||
|
||||
def check_sat(self, expected=["sat", "unsat", "unknown", "timeout", "interrupted"]):
|
||||
if self.smt2_assumptions:
|
||||
assume_exprs = " ".join(self.smt2_assumptions.values())
|
||||
check_stmt = f"(check-sat-assuming ({assume_exprs}))"
|
||||
else:
|
||||
check_stmt = "(check-sat)"
|
||||
if self.debug_print:
|
||||
print("> (check-sat)")
|
||||
print(f"> {check_stmt}")
|
||||
if self.debug_file and not self.nocomments:
|
||||
print("; running check-sat..", file=self.debug_file)
|
||||
self.debug_file.flush()
|
||||
|
@ -800,7 +813,7 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
for cache_stmt in cache_ctx:
|
||||
self.p_write(cache_stmt + "\n", False)
|
||||
|
||||
self.p_write("(check-sat)\n", True)
|
||||
self.p_write(f"{check_stmt}\n", True)
|
||||
|
||||
if self.timeinfo:
|
||||
i = 0
|
||||
|
@ -868,7 +881,7 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
|
||||
if self.debug_file:
|
||||
print("(set-info :status %s)" % result, file=self.debug_file)
|
||||
print("(check-sat)", file=self.debug_file)
|
||||
print(check_stmt, file=self.debug_file)
|
||||
self.debug_file.flush()
|
||||
|
||||
if result not in expected:
|
||||
|
@ -945,6 +958,48 @@ class SmtIo:
|
|||
def bv2int(self, v):
|
||||
return int(self.bv2bin(v), 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def get_raw_unsat_assumptions(self):
|
||||
self.write("(get-unsat-assumptions)")
|
||||
exprs = set(self.unparse(part) for part in self.parse(self.read()))
|
||||
unsat_assumptions = []
|
||||
for key, value in self.smt2_assumptions.items():
|
||||
# normalize expression
|
||||
value = self.unparse(self.parse(value))
|
||||
if value in exprs:
|
||||
exprs.remove(value)
|
||||
unsat_assumptions.append(key)
|
||||
return unsat_assumptions
|
||||
|
||||
def get_unsat_assumptions(self, minimize=False):
|
||||
if not minimize:
|
||||
return self.get_raw_unsat_assumptions()
|
||||
required_assumptions = {}
|
||||
|
||||
while True:
|
||||
candidate_assumptions = {}
|
||||
for key in self.get_raw_unsat_assumptions():
|
||||
if key not in required_assumptions:
|
||||
candidate_assumptions[key] = self.smt2_assumptions[key]
|
||||
|
||||
while candidate_assumptions:
|
||||
|
||||
candidate_key, candidate_assume = candidate_assumptions.popitem()
|
||||
|
||||
self.smt2_assumptions = {}
|
||||
for key, assume in candidate_assumptions.items():
|
||||
self.smt2_assumptions[key] = assume
|
||||
for key, assume in required_assumptions.items():
|
||||
self.smt2_assumptions[key] = assume
|
||||
result = self.check_sat()
|
||||
|
||||
if result == 'unsat':
|
||||
candidate_assumptions = None
|
||||
else:
|
||||
required_assumptions[candidate_key] = candidate_assume
|
||||
|
||||
if candidate_assumptions is not None:
|
||||
return list(required_assumptions)
|
||||
|
||||
def get(self, expr):
|
||||
self.write("(get-value (%s))" % (expr))
|
||||
return self.parse(self.read())[0][1]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue