fix bugs in routing identification
This commit is contained in:
parent
a9df922412
commit
5c646f5de7
|
@ -150,6 +150,11 @@ boolean is_two_sb_rr_nodes_mirror(t_sb* src_sb, t_sb* des_sb, int side,
|
||||||
!= des_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode]->type) {
|
!= des_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode]->type) {
|
||||||
return FALSE;
|
return FALSE;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
/* switch type should be the same */
|
||||||
|
if ( src_rr_node->drive_switches[inode]
|
||||||
|
!= des_rr_node->drive_switches[inode]) {
|
||||||
|
return FALSE;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
int src_node_id, des_node_id;
|
int src_node_id, des_node_id;
|
||||||
int src_node_side, des_node_side;
|
int src_node_side, des_node_side;
|
||||||
get_rr_node_side_and_index_in_sb_info(src_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode], *src_sb, OUT_PORT, &src_node_side, &src_node_id);
|
get_rr_node_side_and_index_in_sb_info(src_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode], *src_sb, OUT_PORT, &src_node_side, &src_node_id);
|
||||||
|
@ -185,6 +190,11 @@ boolean is_two_cb_rr_nodes_mirror(t_cb* src_cb, t_cb* des_cb,
|
||||||
!= des_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode]->type) {
|
!= des_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode]->type) {
|
||||||
return FALSE;
|
return FALSE;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
/* switch type should be the same */
|
||||||
|
if ( src_rr_node->drive_switches[inode]
|
||||||
|
!= des_rr_node->drive_switches[inode]) {
|
||||||
|
return FALSE;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
int src_node_id, des_node_id;
|
int src_node_id, des_node_id;
|
||||||
int src_node_side, des_node_side;
|
int src_node_side, des_node_side;
|
||||||
get_rr_node_side_and_index_in_cb_info(src_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode], *src_cb, OUT_PORT, &src_node_side, &src_node_id);
|
get_rr_node_side_and_index_in_cb_info(src_rr_node->drive_rr_nodes[inode], *src_cb, OUT_PORT, &src_node_side, &src_node_id);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue