[Doc] Add disclaimer for limitations when using repack pin constraints
This commit is contained in:
parent
8046b16c15
commit
2e1cc5499d
|
@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
|
|||
Repack Design Constraints (.xml)
|
||||
--------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning:: For the best practice, current repack design constraints only support the net remapping between pins in the same port. Pin constraints are **NOT** allowed for two separated ports.
|
||||
|
||||
- A legal pin constraint example: when there are two clock nets, ``clk0`` and ``clk1``, pin constraints are forced on two pins in a clock port ``clk[0:2]`` (e.g., ``clk[0] = clk0`` and ``clk[1] == clk1``).
|
||||
- An **illegal** pin constraint example: when there are two clock nets, ``clk0`` and ``clk1``, pin constraints are forced on two clock ports ``clkA[0]`` and ``clkB[0]`` (e.g., ``clkA[0] = clk0`` and ``clkB[0] == clk1``).
|
||||
|
||||
An example of design constraints is shown as follows.
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: xml
|
||||
|
@ -25,5 +30,5 @@ An example of design constraints is shown as follows.
|
|||
.. option:: net="<string>"
|
||||
|
||||
The net name of the pin to be mapped, which should be consistent with net definition in your ``.blif`` file. The reserved word ``OPEN`` means that no net should be mapped to a given pin. Please ensure that it is not conflicted with any net names in your ``.blif`` file.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning:: Design constraints is a feature for power-users. It may cause repack to fail. It is users's responsibility to ensure proper design constraints
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue