From fa61f33b9886908a66320a264fe137edfa59efee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Hearn <mike@navi.cx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:26:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] note about knotify

---
 SPECIFICATION | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/SPECIFICATION b/SPECIFICATION
index 45e0233..be305dc 100644
--- a/SPECIFICATION
+++ b/SPECIFICATION
@@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ If a client requires a response from a passive popup, it should be
 coded such that a non-focus-stealing message box can be used instead
 and the notification server is only used when available.
 
+FIXME: is this enough? is it even worth trying to be compatible with
+KNotify given how different these systems are? Might just be easier to
+implement this protocol in KNotify itself as a separate thing.
 
 
 MARKUP