.gitignore

@@ -1,4 +1,3 @@
 *.swp
 go.mod
 go.sum
-*.pb.go

Makefile

@@ -15,15 +15,7 @@ goimports:
 
 test:
 	# GO111MODULE=off go run format_rich_log.go log/2025-08-20-rich.text
-	# GO111MODULE=off go run format_rich_log.go log/2025-08-20-full.text
-	GO111MODULE=off go run format_rich_log.go log/2025-08-20-final.text
+	GO111MODULE=off go run format_rich_log.go log/2025-08-20-full.text
 
 gemini-config:
 	cp ~/.gemini/GEMINI.md .
-
-gemini-go:
-	~/go/bin/gemini playback
-
-add:
-	~/go/bin/gemini --add log/BACnet.text
-	ls -lt ~/.config/gemini/

chat.proto

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-syntax = "proto3";
-
-package main;
-
-message Row {
-        repeated string   fields          = 1;
-}
-
-message Table {
-        int32             columns         = 1;
-        repeated Row      rows            = 2;
-}
-message Chat {
-        bool              gemini          = 1;
-        bool              user            = 2;
-        string            content         = 3;
-        repeated string   mountpoints     = 4;
-}
-
-message Chats {                                 // `autogenpb:marshal` `autogenpb:mutex`
-        string            uuid            = 1;  // `autogenpb:uuid:9fd31f10-c25d-4d66-bc8d-5f6eb7c79057`
-        string            version         = 2;  // `autogenpb:version:v0.0.1`
-        repeated Chat     Chats           = 3;  // THIS MUST BE  Chat  and then  Chats
-}

log/BACnet.text

@@ -1,12 +0,0 @@
-uuid: "bacnet-log-01"
-version: "v0.0.3 go.wit.com/lib/protobuf/chatpb"
-Chats: {
-  from: USER
-  ctime: { seconds: 1724166000 }
-  ContentFile: "content/bacnet_q1.content"
-}
-Chats: {
-  from: GEMINI
-  ctime: { seconds: 1724166060 }
-  ContentFile: "content/bacnet_a1.content"
-}

log/content/bacnet_a1.content

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-You've described the situation perfectly. The protocol you're thinking of for HVAC and industrial controls is almost certainly **BACnet** or **Modbus**.
-
-Both are foundational protocols in building automation and industrial control, and they share the same conceptual space as CAN bus does for vehicles.
-
-First, to clarify your other point: **CAN bus** (Controller Area Network) is exactly what it's called. It's a robust vehicle bus standard designed to allow microcontrollers and devices to communicate with each other's applications without a host computer.
-
-Here is a breakdown of the industrial/HVAC equivalents:
-
-| Protocol | Primary Use | Physical Layer | Key Concept (How it's like CAN bus) |
-| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
-| **BACnet** | **Modern HVAC & Building Automation** | Runs on many layers, but commonly **RS-485** (a 2-wire bus, like CAN) or Ethernet (BACnet/IP). | This is the dominant, open standard for complex building control (chillers, air handlers, lighting, security). It allows devices from different manufacturers to interoperate in a single system. |
-| **Modbus** | **Industrial Controls & Simple HVAC** | Also commonly runs on **RS-485** (Modbus RTU) or Ethernet (Modbus TCP). | This is the de facto standard for industrial devices. It's simpler than BACnet and is a master-slave protocol (one device polls, others respond), but it serves the same purpose of connecting sensors, drives, and controllers on a shared network. |
-| **LonWorks** | Building, Home, and Industrial Automation | Twisted Pair (Free Topology) | A strong competitor to BACnet. It's a peer-to-peer protocol, which is conceptually very similar to CAN's multi-master design, where any device can initiate communication. |
-
-### Which one are you thinking of?
-
-*   If you're thinking about a modern, large commercial building's entire automation system, the answer is **BACnet**.
-*   If you're thinking about the most common, simple, and widespread protocol for connecting industrial sensors, VFDs (Variable Frequency Drives), and basic controllers, the answer is **Modbus**.
-
-Given the direct comparison to CAN bus as a system-wide network, **BACnet** is the most likely protocol you're trying to remember for the HVAC world.

log/content/bacnet_q1.content

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-there is a protocol used in HVAC and instustrial controls but I forgot what it is called. It is similar in concept to what the automotive industry uses called "canBUS" or "CAN BUS" (I'm not sure what that is called either).

openocd-reboot.cfg

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-# OpenOCD Configuration to REBOOT a SiFive HiFive Pro P550 Board (v5)
-# Correctly handles separate JTAG and System resets to prevent timeouts.
+# OpenOCD Configuration to REBOOT a SiFive HiFive Pro P550 Board
 
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------
 # 1. Adapter and Board Configuration
@@ -7,8 +6,6 @@
 adapter driver ftdi
 ftdi channel 2
 ftdi vid_pid 0x0403 0x6011
-adapter speed 1000
-
 ftdi layout_init 0x0808 0x0a1b
 ftdi layout_signal nSRST -oe 0x0200
 ftdi layout_signal nTRST -data 0x0100 -oe 0x0100
@@ -18,34 +15,40 @@ ftdi layout_signal nTRST -data 0x0100 -oe 0x0100
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------
 transport select jtag
 set _CHIPNAME riscv
-jtag newtap $_CHIPNAME cpu -irlen 5
+jtag newtap $_CHIPNAME cpu -irlen 5 ;# P550 has an IR length of 5
 
+# Define the 4 P550 cores
 target create riscv.cpu0 riscv -chain-position $_CHIPNAME.cpu -coreid 0
 target create riscv.cpu1 riscv -chain-position $_CHIPNAME.cpu -coreid 1
 target create riscv.cpu2 riscv -chain-position $_CHIPNAME.cpu -coreid 2
 target create riscv.cpu3 riscv -chain-position $_CHIPNAME.cpu -coreid 3
+
+# Group the cores for simultaneous operations like halt/resume
 target smp riscv.cpu0 riscv.cpu1 riscv.cpu2 riscv.cpu3
 
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------
 # 3. Reset Configuration and Execution
 # ----------------------------------------------------------------
 
-# CRITICAL: Configure the reset strategy.
-# 'srst_only': The 'reset' command will only pulse the nSRST line.
-# 'separate':  Tells OpenOCD that nSRST and nTRST are independent signals.
-#              This allows the 'init' command to correctly reset the JTAG TAP
-#              (using nTRST) before trying to communicate with it.
-reset_config srst_only separate
+# This is the key command. It tells OpenOCD that a "reset" should
+# assert (pull low) the nSRST signal.
+# srst_only: Asserts only nSRST, not nTRST (JTAG reset).
+# srst_pulls_trst: Informs OpenOCD that the board hardware ties nSRST and nTRST together.
+reset_config srst_only srst_pulls_trst
 
-# Initialize OpenOCD. This will now correctly reset the JTAG chain.
+# Initialize OpenOCD and connect to the target
 init
 
-# Issue the system reset. Because of the config above, this will now
-# cleanly pulse the nSRST line, causing a hardware reboot.
-echo "!!! Issuing system reset to reboot the board..."
+# Halt the cores to gain control
+halt
+
+# This command now triggers the nSRST signal as configured above.
+# It will pulse the reset line, causing a full hardware reboot.
+echo "!!! Pulsing system reset (nSRST) to reboot the board..."
 reset
 
-echo "!!! Board has been reset and should be rebooting now."
+# Optional: If you want the board to start running immediately after reboot
+# resume
 
 # Exit OpenOCD
 shutdown