jtag: Rename 'hasidcode' to 'has_idcode'
While at it, fix some coding style issues. Change-Id: I8196045f46ce043ed0d28cb95470132b3a7de1bb Signed-off-by: Marc Schink <dev@zapb.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/8039 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d3d287bf67
commit
f018cd7d90
|
@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ static int xcf_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* check idcode and alloc memory for sector table */
|
||||
if (!bank->target->tap->hasidcode)
|
||||
if (!bank->target->tap->has_idcode)
|
||||
return ERROR_FLASH_OPERATION_FAILED;
|
||||
|
||||
/* guess number of blocks using chip ID */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1177,7 +1177,7 @@ static bool jtag_examine_chain_end(uint8_t *idcodes, unsigned count, unsigned ma
|
|||
static bool jtag_examine_chain_match_tap(const struct jtag_tap *tap)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
if (tap->expected_ids_cnt == 0 || !tap->hasidcode)
|
||||
if (tap->expected_ids_cnt == 0 || !tap->has_idcode)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/* optionally ignore the JTAG version field - bits 28-31 of IDCODE */
|
||||
|
@ -1283,13 +1283,13 @@ static int jtag_examine_chain(void)
|
|||
/* Zero for LSB indicates a device in bypass */
|
||||
LOG_INFO("TAP %s does not have valid IDCODE (idcode=0x%" PRIx32 ")",
|
||||
tap->dotted_name, idcode);
|
||||
tap->hasidcode = false;
|
||||
tap->has_idcode = false;
|
||||
tap->idcode = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
bit_count += 1;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
/* Friendly devices support IDCODE */
|
||||
tap->hasidcode = true;
|
||||
tap->has_idcode = true;
|
||||
tap->idcode = idcode;
|
||||
jtag_examine_chain_display(LOG_LVL_INFO, "tap/device found", tap->dotted_name, idcode);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ int hl_interface_init_target(struct target *t)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
t->tap->priv = &hl_if;
|
||||
t->tap->hasidcode = 1;
|
||||
t->tap->has_idcode = true;
|
||||
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct jtag_tap {
|
|||
uint32_t idcode; /**< device identification code */
|
||||
/** not all devices have idcode,
|
||||
* we'll discover this during chain examination */
|
||||
bool hasidcode;
|
||||
bool has_idcode;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Array of expected identification codes */
|
||||
uint32_t *expected_ids;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int intel_check_for_unique_id(struct intel_pld_device *intel_info)
|
|||
|
||||
static int intel_check_config(struct intel_pld_device *intel_info)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!intel_info->tap->hasidcode) {
|
||||
if (!intel_info->tap->has_idcode) {
|
||||
LOG_ERROR("no IDCODE");
|
||||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int lattice_check_device_family(struct lattice_pld_device *lattice_device
|
|||
if (lattice_device->family != LATTICE_UNKNOWN && lattice_device->preload_length != 0)
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lattice_device->tap || !lattice_device->tap->hasidcode)
|
||||
if (!lattice_device->tap || !lattice_device->tap->has_idcode)
|
||||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
|
||||
for (size_t i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lattice_devices); ++i) {
|
||||
|
@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int lattice_load_command(struct pld_device *pld_device, const char *filen
|
|||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
struct jtag_tap *tap = lattice_device->tap;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!tap || !tap->hasidcode)
|
||||
if (!tap || !tap->has_idcode)
|
||||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
|
||||
int retval = lattice_check_device_family(lattice_device);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ static int dsp563xx_examine(struct target *target)
|
|||
{
|
||||
uint32_t chip;
|
||||
|
||||
if (target->tap->hasidcode == false) {
|
||||
if (!target->tap->has_idcode) {
|
||||
LOG_ERROR("no IDCODE present on device");
|
||||
return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue