riscv-compliance: Incorporate feedback to make tests make fewer assumptions about hte implementation and properly use OpenOCD functions
This commit is contained in:
parent
716c12bcaf
commit
ef684c2e68
|
@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ static dm013_info_t *get_dm(struct target *target)
|
|||
static uint32_t hartsel_mask(const struct target *target)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RISCV013_INFO(info);
|
||||
/* TODO: Properly handle hartselhi as well*/
|
||||
return ((1L<<info->hartsellen)-1) << DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTSELLO_OFFSET;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2955,30 +2956,34 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
int total_tests = 0;
|
||||
int passed_tests = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
uint32_t dmcontrol_orig;
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
uint32_t dmcontrol_orig = 0;
|
||||
uint32_t dmcontrol;
|
||||
uint32_t testvar;
|
||||
uint32_t testvar_read;
|
||||
riscv_reg_t value;
|
||||
RISCV013_INFO(info);
|
||||
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, hartsel_mask(target), RISCV_MAX_HARTS-1);
|
||||
/* TODO: Support HARTSELLHI as well */
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTSELLO, RISCV_MAX_HARTS-1);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(dmcontrol, hartsel_mask(target)) == (RISCV_MAX_HARTS-1),
|
||||
"DMCONTROL.hartsel should hold all the harts allowed by HARTSELLEN.");
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTSELLO) == (uint32_t) ((1 << info->hartsellen) - 1),
|
||||
"DMCONTROL.hartsello should hold all the harts allowed by its hartsellen.");
|
||||
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, hartsel_mask(target), 0);
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTSELLO, 0);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(dmcontrol, hartsel_mask(target)) == 0, "DMCONTROL.hartsel should hold Hart ID 0");
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTSELLO) == 0,
|
||||
"DMCONTROL.hartsello should hold Hart ID 0");
|
||||
|
||||
/* hartreset */
|
||||
/* This field is optional. Either we can read and write it to 1/0,
|
||||
or it is tied to 0. */
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTRESET, 1);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
testvar = get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTRESET);
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTRESET, 1);
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTRESET, 0);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(((testvar == 0) || (get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HARTRESET)) == 0),
|
||||
|
@ -2989,7 +2994,7 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
testvar = get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HASEL);
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HASEL, 1);
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol_orig, DMI_DMCONTROL_HASEL, 0);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(((testvar == 0) || (get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_HASEL)) == 0),
|
||||
|
@ -2998,45 +3003,21 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
|
||||
/* haltreq */
|
||||
riscv_halt_all_harts(target);
|
||||
/* Writing haltreq should not cause any problems for a halted hart, but we
|
||||
should be able to read and write it. */
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
dmcontrol |= DMI_DMCONTROL_HALTREQ;
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(dmcontrol & DMI_DMCONTROL_HALTREQ, "DMCONTROL.haltreq should be R/W");
|
||||
uint32_t dmstatus, dmstatus_read;
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
} while ((dmstatus & DMI_DMSTATUS_ALLHALTED) == 0);
|
||||
/* This bit is not actually readable according to the spec, so nothing to check.*/
|
||||
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMSTATUS, 0xffffffff);
|
||||
/* DMSTATUS */
|
||||
uint32_t dmstatus, dmstatus_read;
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMSTATUS, ~dmstatus);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus_read, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(dmstatus_read == dmstatus, "DMSTATUS is R/O");
|
||||
|
||||
/* resumereq. This will resume the hart but this test is destructive anyway. */
|
||||
dmcontrol &= ~DMI_DMCONTROL_HALTREQ;
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_RESUMEREQ, 1);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_RESUMEREQ) == 1,
|
||||
"DMCONTROL.resumereq should be R/W");
|
||||
/* resumereq */
|
||||
/* This bit is not actually readable according to the spec, so nothing to check.*/
|
||||
riscv_resume_all_harts(target);
|
||||
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
} while (get_field(dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS_ALLRESUMEACK) == 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Halt the hart again because the target isn't aware that we resumed it. */
|
||||
dmcontrol = set_field(dmcontrol, DMI_DMCONTROL_RESUMEREQ, 0);
|
||||
dmcontrol |= DMI_DMCONTROL_HALTREQ;
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
} while ((dmstatus & DMI_DMSTATUS_ALLHALTED) == 0);
|
||||
dmcontrol &= ~DMI_DMCONTROL_HALTREQ;
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DMCONTROL, dmcontrol);
|
||||
/* Not clear that this read is required according to the spec. */
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &dmstatus, DMI_DMSTATUS);
|
||||
/* Halt all harts again so the test can continue.*/
|
||||
riscv_halt_all_harts(target);
|
||||
|
||||
/* HARTINFO: Read-Only. This is per-hart, so need to adjust hartsel. */
|
||||
for (int hartsel = 0; hartsel < riscv_count_harts(target); hartsel++) {
|
||||
|
@ -3048,10 +3029,13 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
dmi_read(target, &hartinfo_read, DMI_HARTINFO);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST((hartinfo_read == hartinfo), "DMHARTINFO should be Read-Only.");
|
||||
|
||||
/* $dscratch CSRs */
|
||||
uint32_t nscratch = get_field(hartinfo, DMI_HARTINFO_NSCRATCH);
|
||||
for (unsigned int d = 0; d < nscratch; d++) {
|
||||
/* TODO: DSCRATCH CSRs should be 64-bit on 64-bit systems. */
|
||||
riscv_reg_t testval;
|
||||
riscv_reg_t testval, testval_read;
|
||||
/* Because DSCRATCH is not guaranteed to last across PB executions, need to put
|
||||
this all into one PB execution. Which may not be possible on all implementations.*/
|
||||
if (info->progbufsize >= 5) {
|
||||
for (testval = 0x0011223300112233;
|
||||
testval != 0xDEAD;
|
||||
testval = testval == 0x0011223300112233 ? ~testval : 0xDEAD) {
|
||||
|
@ -3065,16 +3049,18 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
riscv_program_ebreak(&program32);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(riscv_program_exec(&program32, target) == ERROR_OK,
|
||||
"Accessing DSCRATCH with program buffer should succeed.");
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(register_read_direct(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_S1) == ERROR_OK,
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(register_read_direct(target, &testval_read, GDB_REGNO_S1) == ERROR_OK,
|
||||
"Need to be able to read S1 in order to test DSCRATCH.");
|
||||
if (riscv_xlen(target) > 32)
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(value == testval,
|
||||
if (riscv_xlen(target) > 32) {
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testval == testval_read,
|
||||
"All DSCRATCH registers in HARTINFO must be R/W.");
|
||||
else
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(value == (testval & 0xFFFFFFFF),
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testval_read == (testval & 0xFFFFFFFF),
|
||||
"All DSCRATCH registers in HARTINFO must be R/W.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* TODO: dataaccess */
|
||||
if (get_field(hartinfo, DMI_HARTINFO_DATAACCESS)) {
|
||||
/* TODO: Shadowed in memory map. */
|
||||
|
@ -3153,7 +3139,7 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*Check that all reported ProgBuf words are really R/W */
|
||||
/* Check that all reported ProgBuf words are really R/W */
|
||||
for (int invert = 0; invert < 2; invert++) {
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < get_field(abstractcs, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_PROGBUFSIZE); i++) {
|
||||
testvar = (i + 1) * 0x11111111;
|
||||
|
@ -3173,60 +3159,35 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
/* TODO: Cause and clear all error types */
|
||||
|
||||
/* COMMAND
|
||||
TODO: Unclear from the spec whether all these bits need to truly be R/W.
|
||||
According to the spec, this register is only W, so can't really check the read result.
|
||||
But at any rate, this is not legal and should cause an error. */
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_COMMAND, 0xAAAAAAAA);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_COMMAND);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar_read == 0xAAAAAAAA, "COMMAND register should be R/W");
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR) == CMDERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, \
|
||||
"Illegal COMMAND should result in UNSUPPORTED");
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_COMMAND, 0x55555555);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_COMMAND);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar_read == 0x55555555, "COMMAND register should be R/W");
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR) == CMDERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, \
|
||||
"Illegal COMMAND should result in UNSUPPORTED");
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTCS, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Basic Abstract Commands */
|
||||
uint32_t command = 0;
|
||||
uint32_t busy;
|
||||
command = set_field(command, AC_ACCESS_REGISTER_SIZE, riscv_xlen(target) > 32 ? 3 : 2);
|
||||
command = set_field(command, AC_ACCESS_REGISTER_TRANSFER, 1);
|
||||
for (unsigned int i = 1; i < 32; i = i << 1) {
|
||||
command = set_field(command, AC_ACCESS_REGISTER_REGNO, 0x1000 + GDB_REGNO_ZERO + i);
|
||||
command = set_field(command, AC_ACCESS_REGISTER_WRITE, 1);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DATA0, i);
|
||||
if (riscv_xlen(target) > 32)
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DATA0 + 1, i + 1);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_COMMAND, command);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
busy = get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_BUSY);
|
||||
} while (busy);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR) == 0,
|
||||
riscv_reg_t testval = i | ((i + 1ULL) << 32);
|
||||
riscv_reg_t testval_read;
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(ERROR_OK == register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_ZERO + i, testval),
|
||||
"GPR Writes should be supported.");
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DATA0, 0xDEADBEEF);
|
||||
if (riscv_xlen(target) > 32)
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_DATA0 + 1, 0xDEADBEEF);
|
||||
command = set_field(command, AC_ACCESS_REGISTER_WRITE, 0);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_COMMAND, command);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
busy = get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_BUSY);
|
||||
} while (busy);
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(get_field(testvar_read, DMI_ABSTRACTCS_CMDERR) == 0,
|
||||
write_abstract_arg(target, 0, 0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF, 64);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(ERROR_OK == register_read_direct(target, &testval_read, GDB_REGNO_ZERO + i),
|
||||
"GPR Reads should be supported.");
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_DATA0);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar_read == i, "GPR Reads and writes should be supported.");
|
||||
if (riscv_xlen(target) > 32) {
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &testvar_read, DMI_DATA0 + 1);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar_read == (i + 1),
|
||||
"GPR Reads and writes should be supported.");
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testval == testval_read, "GPR Reads and writes should be supported.");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST((testval & 0xFFFFFFFF) == testval_read, "GPR Reads and writes should be supported.");
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -3234,17 +3195,20 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
See which bits are actually writable */
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTAUTO, 0xFFFFFFFF);
|
||||
uint32_t abstractauto;
|
||||
uint32_t busy;
|
||||
dmi_read(target, &abstractauto, DMI_ABSTRACTAUTO);
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTAUTO, 0x0);
|
||||
if (abstractauto > 0) {
|
||||
testvar = 0;
|
||||
/* TODO: This mechanism only works when you have a reasonable sized progbuf, which is not
|
||||
/* This mechanism only works when you have a reasonable sized progbuf, which is not
|
||||
a true compliance requirement. */
|
||||
uint32_t result = riscv_set_register(target, GDB_REGNO_S0, 0);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(result == ERROR_OK, "Need to be able to write S0 to test ABSTRACTAUTO");
|
||||
if (info->progbufsize >= 3) {
|
||||
|
||||
testvar = 0;
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(ERROR_OK == register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_S0, 0),
|
||||
"Need to be able to write S0 to test ABSTRACTAUTO");
|
||||
struct riscv_program program;
|
||||
riscv_program_init(&program, target);
|
||||
/* Also testing that WFI() is a NOP during debug mode. */
|
||||
/* This is also testing that WFI() is a NOP during debug mode. */
|
||||
riscv_program_insert(&program, wfi());
|
||||
riscv_program_addi(&program, GDB_REGNO_S0, GDB_REGNO_S0, 1);
|
||||
riscv_program_ebreak(&program);
|
||||
|
@ -3281,12 +3245,15 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
dmi_write(target, DMI_ABSTRACTAUTO, 0);
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_S0);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(ERROR_OK == register_read_direct(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_S0),
|
||||
"Need to be able to read S0 to test ABSTRACTAUTO");
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar == value, \
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(testvar == value,
|
||||
"ABSTRACTAUTO should cause COMMAND to run the expected number of times.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Single-Step each hart. */
|
||||
for (int hartsel = 0; hartsel < riscv_count_harts(target); hartsel++) {
|
||||
riscv_set_current_hartid(target, hartsel);
|
||||
|
@ -3302,11 +3269,11 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
riscv_set_current_hartid(target, hartsel);
|
||||
|
||||
/* DCSR Tests */
|
||||
riscv_set_register(target, GDB_REGNO_DCSR, 0x0);
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DCSR);
|
||||
register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_DCSR, 0x0);
|
||||
register_read_direct(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DCSR);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(value != 0, "Not all bits in DCSR are writable by Debugger");
|
||||
riscv_set_register(target, GDB_REGNO_DCSR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DCSR);
|
||||
register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_DCSR, 0xFFFFFFFF);
|
||||
register_read_direct(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DCSR);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(value != 0, "At least some bits in DCSR must be 1");
|
||||
|
||||
/* DPC. Note that DPC is sign-extended. */
|
||||
|
@ -3319,12 +3286,12 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
if (riscv_supports_extension(target, riscv_current_hartid(target), 'C'))
|
||||
dpcmask |= 0x2;
|
||||
|
||||
riscv_set_register(target, GDB_REGNO_DPC, dpcmask);
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &dpc, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_DPC, dpcmask);
|
||||
register_read_direct(target, &dpc, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(dpcmask == dpc,
|
||||
"DPC must be sign-extended to XLEN and writable to all-1s (except the least significant bits)");
|
||||
riscv_set_register(target, GDB_REGNO_DPC, 0);
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &dpc, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
register_write_direct(target, GDB_REGNO_DPC, 0);
|
||||
register_read_direct(target, &dpc, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(dpc == 0, "DPC must be writable to 0.");
|
||||
if (hartsel == 0)
|
||||
bogus_dpc = dpc; /* For a later test step */
|
||||
|
@ -3389,7 +3356,7 @@ int riscv013_test_compliance(struct target *target)
|
|||
just verify that at least it's not the bogus value anymore. */
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(bogus_dpc != 0xdeadbeef, "BOGUS DPC should have been set somehow (bug in compliance test)");
|
||||
riscv_get_register(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
register_read_direct(target, &value, GDB_REGNO_DPC);
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(bogus_dpc != value, "NDMRESET should move DPC to reset value.");
|
||||
|
||||
COMPLIANCE_TEST(riscv_halt_reason(target, 0) == RISCV_HALT_INTERRUPT,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue