Fixes of review findings

Change-Id: Ie9889d995d7b2a6e458ad5f66cc3d990888f54ec
Signed-off-by: Jan Matyas <jan.matyas@codasip.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jan Matyas 2024-02-09 08:30:18 +01:00
parent 67a3d4fe7f
commit 9bcbae13e0
1 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
#define DMI_SCAN_MAX_BIT_LENGTH (DTM_DMI_MAX_ADDRESS_LENGTH + DTM_DMI_DATA_LENGTH + DTM_DMI_OP_LENGTH)
#define DMI_SCAN_BUF_SIZE (DIV_ROUND_UP(DMI_SCAN_MAX_BIT_LENGTH, 8))
#define BATCH_RESERVED_SCANS 4
/* Reserve extra room in the batch (needed for the last NOP operation) */
#define BATCH_RESERVED_SCANS 1
static void dump_field(int idle, const struct scan_field *field);
@ -37,6 +38,9 @@ struct riscv_batch *riscv_batch_alloc(struct target *target, size_t scans, size_
out->bscan_ctxt = NULL;
out->read_keys = NULL;
/* FIXME: There is potential for memory usage reduction. We could allocate
* smaller buffers than DMI_SCAN_BUF_SIZE (that is, buffers that correspond to
* the real DR scan length on the given target) */
out->data_out = malloc(sizeof(*out->data_out) * scans * DMI_SCAN_BUF_SIZE);
if (!out->data_out) {
LOG_ERROR("Failed to allocate data_out in RISC-V batch.");
@ -84,7 +88,7 @@ void riscv_batch_free(struct riscv_batch *batch)
bool riscv_batch_full(struct riscv_batch *batch)
{
return batch->used_scans >= (batch->allocated_scans - BATCH_RESERVED_SCANS);
return riscv_batch_available_scans(batch) == 0;
}
int riscv_batch_run(struct riscv_batch *batch)
@ -98,7 +102,7 @@ int riscv_batch_run(struct riscv_batch *batch)
for (size_t i = 0; i < batch->used_scans; ++i) {
if (bscan_tunnel_ir_width != 0)
riscv_add_bscan_tunneled_scan(batch->target, batch->fields+i, batch->bscan_ctxt+i);
riscv_add_bscan_tunneled_scan(batch->target, batch->fields + i, batch->bscan_ctxt + i);
else
jtag_add_dr_scan(batch->target->tap, 1, batch->fields + i, TAP_IDLE);