Merge pull request #60 from riscv/tim
Fix dmi_read() indentation; remove \n in LOG_ERROR
This commit is contained in:
commit
7af58e6283
|
@ -367,9 +367,9 @@ static uint64_t dmi_read(struct target *target, uint16_t address)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
unsigned i = 0;
|
unsigned i = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// This first loop ensures that the read request was actually sent
|
// This first loop ensures that the read request was actually sent
|
||||||
// to the target. Note that if for some reason this stays busy,
|
// to the target. Note that if for some reason this stays busy,
|
||||||
// it is actually due to the Previous dmi_read or dmi_write.
|
// it is actually due to the Previous dmi_read or dmi_write.
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
|
||||||
status = dmi_scan(target, NULL, NULL, DMI_OP_READ, address, 0,
|
status = dmi_scan(target, NULL, NULL, DMI_OP_READ, address, 0,
|
||||||
false);
|
false);
|
||||||
|
@ -378,35 +378,35 @@ static uint64_t dmi_read(struct target *target, uint16_t address)
|
||||||
} else if (status == DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
} else if (status == DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
LOG_ERROR("failed read from 0x%x, status=%d\n", address, status);
|
LOG_ERROR("failed read from 0x%x, status=%d", address, status);
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (status != DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
if (status != DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||||
LOG_ERROR("Failed read from 0x%x; value=0x%" PRIx64 ", status=%d\n",
|
LOG_ERROR("Failed read from 0x%x; value=0x%" PRIx64 ", status=%d",
|
||||||
address, value, status);
|
address, value, status);
|
||||||
abort();
|
abort();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// This second loop ensures that we got the read
|
// This second loop ensures that we got the read
|
||||||
// data back. Note that NOP can result in a 'busy' result as well, but
|
// data back. Note that NOP can result in a 'busy' result as well, but
|
||||||
// that would be noticed on the next DMI access we do.
|
// that would be noticed on the next DMI access we do.
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
|
||||||
status = dmi_scan(target, &address_in, &value, DMI_OP_NOP, address, 0,
|
status = dmi_scan(target, &address_in, &value, DMI_OP_NOP, address, 0,
|
||||||
false);
|
false);
|
||||||
if (status == DMI_STATUS_BUSY) {
|
if (status == DMI_STATUS_BUSY) {
|
||||||
increase_dmi_busy_delay(target);
|
increase_dmi_busy_delay(target);
|
||||||
} else if (status == DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
} else if (status == DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
LOG_ERROR("failed read (NOP) at 0x%x, status=%d\n", address, status);
|
LOG_ERROR("failed read (NOP) at 0x%x, status=%d\n", address, status);
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (status != DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
if (status != DMI_STATUS_SUCCESS) {
|
||||||
LOG_ERROR("Failed read (NOP) from 0x%x; value=0x%" PRIx64 ", status=%d\n",
|
LOG_ERROR("Failed read (NOP) from 0x%x; value=0x%" PRIx64 ", status=%d",
|
||||||
address, value, status);
|
address, value, status);
|
||||||
abort();
|
abort();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue