interesting
/
riscv-openocd
mirror of https://github.com/riscv/riscv-openocd.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

flash: write_image will now pad erase to nearest sector 

this is done for unlocking and it is a simple omission that
it wasn't done for sectors.

The unnerving thing is that nobody has complained about this
until now....

Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
This commit is contained in:
Øyvind Harboe 2010-04-29 03:49:32 +02:00
parent 49b7905cae
commit 78248f1df6
1 changed files with 2 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
src/flash/nor/core.c
View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/***************************************************************************
* Copyright (C) 2005 by Dominic Rath <Dominic.Rath@gmx.de> *
* Copyright (C) 2007,2008 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com> *
* Copyright (C) 2007-2010 Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com> *
* Copyright (C) 2008 by Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk> *
* Copyright (C) 2009 Zachary T Welch <zw@superlucidity.net> *
* *
@ -519,12 +519,6 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
struct flash_bank *c;
int *padding;
/* REVISIT do_pad should perhaps just be another parameter.
* GDB wouldn't ever need it, since it erases separately.
* But "flash write_image" commands might want that option.
*/
bool do_pad = false;
section = 0;
section_offset = 0;
@ -694,7 +688,7 @@ int flash_write_unlock(struct target *target, struct image *image,
{
/* calculate and erase sectors */
retval = flash_erase_address_range(target,
do_pad, run_address, run_size);
true, run_address, run_size);
}
}