interesting
/
riscv-openocd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

remove more duplication 

Not sure how the original "move code to adi_v5_swd.c" patch left
some code in the "arm_adi_v5.c" file, but a recent patch was only
a partial fix -- it didn't remove all the duplication.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
This commit is contained in:
David Brownell 2010-03-18 11:56:17 -07:00
parent 46f92878da
commit 52a788e008
1 changed files with 0 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
src/target/arm_adi_v5.c
View File

@ -1572,28 +1572,3 @@ const struct command_registration dap_command_handlers[] = {
};
/*
* This represents the bits which must be sent out on TMS/SWDIO to
* switch a DAP implemented using an SWJ-DP module into SWD mode.
* These bits are stored (and transmitted) LSB-first.
*
* See the DAP-Lite specification, section 2.2.5 for information
* about making the debug link select SWD or JTAG. (Similar info
* is in a few other ARM documents.)
*/
static const uint8_t jtag2swd_bitseq[] = {
/* More than 50 TCK/SWCLK cycles with TMS/SWDIO high,
* putting both JTAG and SWD logic into reset state.
*/
0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
/* Switching sequence enables SWD and disables JTAG
* NOTE: bits in the DP's IDCODE may expose the need for
* an old/deprecated sequence (0xb6 0xed).
*/
0x9e, 0xe7,
/* More than 50 TCK/SWCLK cycles with TMS/SWDIO high,
* putting both JTAG and SWD logic into reset state.
*/
0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff,
};