lpcspifi: assume flash is unprotected after probing

Since the driver doesn't support any hardware flash protection, it
doesn't make sense to report "protected" status after probing, as it
requires extra commands to unprotect before flashing and might be
confusing for the end-users.

Change-Id: I04d96790cc42412df5334951f39fb6723c972ced
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1525
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Fertser 2013-07-23 20:15:32 +04:00 committed by Andreas Fritiofson
parent 421283941b
commit 3b4a8af80d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int lpcspifi_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
sectors[sector].offset = sector * lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize; sectors[sector].offset = sector * lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
sectors[sector].size = lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize; sectors[sector].size = lpcspifi_info->dev->sectorsize;
sectors[sector].is_erased = -1; sectors[sector].is_erased = -1;
sectors[sector].is_protected = 1; sectors[sector].is_protected = 0;
} }
bank->sectors = sectors; bank->sectors = sectors;