Fix overflow in Flush by using receiveAckAware and handling the overrun flag (#237)
Fixes https://github.com/google/nftables/issues/235 Added support for messages having overrun flag Changed `conn.Receive` call to `receiveAckAware` in `Flush`
This commit is contained in:
parent
6a61933ab7
commit
0d9bfa4d18
28
conn.go
28
conn.go
|
@ -154,14 +154,33 @@ func receiveAckAware(nlconn *netlink.Conn, sentMsgFlags netlink.HeaderFlags) ([]
|
|||
return reply, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Dump flag is not set, we expect an ack
|
||||
if len(reply) != 0 {
|
||||
last := reply[len(reply)-1]
|
||||
for re := last.Header.Type; (re&netlink.Overrun) == netlink.Overrun && (re&netlink.Done) != netlink.Done; re = last.Header.Type {
|
||||
// we are not finished, the message is overrun
|
||||
r, err := nlconn.Receive()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
reply = append(reply, r...)
|
||||
last = reply[len(reply)-1]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if last.Header.Type == netlink.Error && binaryutil.BigEndian.Uint32(last.Data[:4]) == 0 {
|
||||
// we have already collected an ack
|
||||
return reply, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Now we expect an ack
|
||||
ack, err := nlconn.Receive()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if len(ack) == 0 {
|
||||
return nil, errors.New("received an empty ack")
|
||||
// received an empty ack?
|
||||
return reply, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
msg := ack[0]
|
||||
|
@ -232,10 +251,7 @@ func (cc *Conn) Flush() error {
|
|||
|
||||
// Fetch the requested acknowledgement for each message we sent.
|
||||
for _, msg := range cc.messages {
|
||||
if msg.Header.Flags&netlink.Acknowledge == 0 {
|
||||
continue // message did not request an acknowledgement
|
||||
}
|
||||
if _, err := conn.Receive(); err != nil {
|
||||
if _, err := receiveAckAware(conn, msg.Header.Flags); err != nil {
|
||||
return fmt.Errorf("conn.Receive: %w", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue