This pull request removes the destruct flag from the state snapshot to
simplify the code.
Previously, this flag indicated that an account was removed during a
state transition, making all associated storage slots inaccessible.
Because storage deletion can involve a large number of slots, the actual
deletion is deferred until the end of the process, where it is handled
in batches.
With the deprecation of self-destruct in the Cancun fork, storage
deletions are no longer expected. Historically, the largest storage
deletion event in Ethereum was around 15 megabytes—manageable in memory.
In this pull request, the single destruct flag is replaced by a set of
deletion markers for individual storage slots. Each deleted storage slot
will now appear in the Storage set with a nil value.
This change will simplify a lot logics, such as storage accessing,
storage flushing, storage iteration and so on.
This PR is a (superior) alternative to https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/26708, it handles deprecation, primarily two specific cases.
`rand.Seed` is typically used in two ways
- `rand.Seed(time.Now().UnixNano())` -- we seed it, just to be sure to get some random, and not always get the same thing on every run. This is not needed, with global seeding, so those are just removed.
- `rand.Seed(1)` this is typically done to ensure we have a stable test. If we rely on this, we need to fix up the tests to use a deterministic prng-source. A few occurrences like this has been replaced with a proper custom source.
`rand.Read` has been replaced by `crypto/rand`.`Read` in this PR.
* core/state/snapshot: implement storage iterator
* core/state/snapshot, tests: implement helper function
* core/state/snapshot: fix storage issue
If an account is deleted in the tx_1 but recreated in the tx_2,
the it can happen that in this diff layer, both destructedSet
and storageData records this account. In this case, the storage
iterator should be able to iterate the slots belong to new account
but disable further iteration in deeper layers(belong to old account)
* core/state/snapshot: address peter and martin's comment
* core/state: address comments
* core/state/snapshot: fix test
* all: seperate consensus error and evm internal error
There are actually two types of error will be returned when
a tranaction/message call is executed: (a) consensus error
(b) evm internal error. The former should be converted to
a consensus issue, e.g. The sender doesn't enough asset to
purchase the gas it specifies. The latter is allowed since
evm itself is a blackbox and internal error is allowed to happen.
This PR emphasizes the difference by introducing a executionResult
structure. The evm error is embedded inside. So if any error
returned, it indicates consensus issue happens.
And also this PR improve the `EstimateGas` API to return the concrete
revert reason if the transaction always fails
* all: polish
* accounts/abi/bind/backends: add tests
* accounts/abi/bind/backends, internal: cleanup error message
* all: address comments
* core: fix lint
* accounts, core, eth, internal: address comments
* accounts, internal: resolve revert reason if possible
* accounts, internal: address comments
rjl493456442
Martin HS
TinyFoxy
Péter Szilágyi