transaction pool changes

- use eventer events to broadcast transactions
- CurrentTransactions -> GetTransactions
- add AddTransactions
This commit is contained in:
zelig 2014-12-14 18:15:48 +00:00
parent b89ed8eb7b
commit c2af10d256
1 changed files with 16 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -10,7 +10,6 @@ import (
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/core/types"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/logger"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/state"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/wire"
)
var txplogger = logger.NewLogger("TXP")
@ -18,7 +17,9 @@ var txplogger = logger.NewLogger("TXP")
const txPoolQueueSize = 50
type TxPoolHook chan *types.Transaction
type TxMsgTy byte
type TxMsg struct {
Tx *types.Transaction
}
const (
minGasPrice = 1000000
@ -26,11 +27,6 @@ const (
var MinGasPrice = big.NewInt(10000000000000)
type TxMsg struct {
Tx *types.Transaction
Type TxMsgTy
}
func EachTx(pool *list.List, it func(*types.Transaction, *list.Element) bool) {
for e := pool.Front(); e != nil; e = e.Next() {
if it(e.Value.(*types.Transaction), e) {
@ -94,7 +90,7 @@ func (pool *TxPool) addTransaction(tx *types.Transaction) {
pool.pool.PushBack(tx)
// Broadcast the transaction to the rest of the peers
pool.Ethereum.Broadcast(wire.MsgTxTy, []interface{}{tx.RlpData()})
pool.Ethereum.EventMux().Post(TxPreEvent{tx})
}
func (pool *TxPool) ValidateTransaction(tx *types.Transaction) error {
@ -169,7 +165,17 @@ func (self *TxPool) Size() int {
return self.pool.Len()
}
func (pool *TxPool) CurrentTransactions() []*types.Transaction {
func (self *TxPool) AddTransactions(txs []*types.Transaction) {
for _, tx := range txs {
if err := self.Add(tx); err != nil {
txplogger.Infoln(err)
} else {
txplogger.Infof("tx %x\n", tx.Hash()[0:4])
}
}
}
func (pool *TxPool) GetTransactions() []*types.Transaction {
pool.mutex.Lock()
defer pool.mutex.Unlock()
@ -216,7 +222,7 @@ func (self *TxPool) RemoveSet(txs types.Transactions) {
}
func (pool *TxPool) Flush() []*types.Transaction {
txList := pool.CurrentTransactions()
txList := pool.GetTransactions()
// Recreate a new list all together
// XXX Is this the fastest way?