Merge pull request #19308 from holiman/fix_reset_txpool
core: make txpool handle reorg due to setHead
This commit is contained in:
commit
b8b4fb004c
|
@ -387,11 +387,26 @@ func (pool *TxPool) reset(oldHead, newHead *types.Header) {
|
|||
} else {
|
||||
// Reorg seems shallow enough to pull in all transactions into memory
|
||||
var discarded, included types.Transactions
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
rem = pool.chain.GetBlock(oldHead.Hash(), oldHead.Number.Uint64())
|
||||
add = pool.chain.GetBlock(newHead.Hash(), newHead.Number.Uint64())
|
||||
)
|
||||
if rem == nil {
|
||||
// This can happen if a setHead is performed, where we simply discard the old
|
||||
// head from the chain.
|
||||
// If that is the case, we don't have the lost transactions any more, and
|
||||
// there's nothing to add
|
||||
if newNum < oldNum {
|
||||
// If the reorg ended up on a lower number, it's indicative of setHead being the cause
|
||||
log.Debug("Skipping transaction reset caused by setHead",
|
||||
"old", oldHead.Hash(), "oldnum", oldNum, "new", newHead.Hash(), "newnum", newNum)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// If we reorged to a same or higher number, then it's not a case of setHead
|
||||
log.Warn("Transaction pool reset with missing oldhead",
|
||||
"old", oldHead.Hash(), "oldnum", oldNum, "new", newHead.Hash(), "newnum", newNum)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
for rem.NumberU64() > add.NumberU64() {
|
||||
discarded = append(discarded, rem.Transactions()...)
|
||||
if rem = pool.chain.GetBlock(rem.ParentHash(), rem.NumberU64()-1); rem == nil {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue