mirror of https://github.com/getdnsapi/getdns.git
Document that thing that we keep forgetting about
This commit is contained in:
parent
9ce441e59a
commit
521e46879b
48
src/stub.c
48
src/stub.c
|
@ -1879,6 +1879,54 @@ _getdns_submit_stub_request(getdns_network_req *netreq)
|
|||
/* For TLS, set a short timeout to catch setup problems. This is reset
|
||||
when the connection is successful.*/
|
||||
GETDNS_CLEAR_EVENT(dnsreq->loop, &netreq->event);
|
||||
/*************************************************************
|
||||
****** *****
|
||||
****** Confusing code alert! *****
|
||||
****** *****
|
||||
*************************************************************
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Synchronous requests have their own event loop for the
|
||||
* occasion of that single request. That event loop is in
|
||||
* the dnsreq structure: dnsreq->loop;
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We do not schedule against and run the context's loop for
|
||||
* the duration of the synchronous query, because:
|
||||
* - Callbacks for outstanding asynchronous queries might fire
|
||||
* as a side effect.
|
||||
* - But worse, since the context's loop is created and managed
|
||||
* by the user, which may well have her own non-dns related
|
||||
* events scheduled against it, they will fire as well as a
|
||||
* side effect of doing the synchronous request!
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Transports that keep connections open, have their own event
|
||||
* structure because have to maintain their connection state.
|
||||
* The event is associated with the upstream struct which also
|
||||
* has a reference to the context's event loop.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If a synchronous request is scheduled for such a transport,
|
||||
* then the synchronous specific event loop temporarily has
|
||||
* to "run" that upstream/transport's event! Outstanding
|
||||
* requests for that upstream/transport might fire then as
|
||||
* well while running the synchronous specific event loop as a
|
||||
* side effect.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, when a RECURSING resolution mode synchronous request
|
||||
* is done, then outstanding/asynchronous RECURSING requests
|
||||
* may fire, as we reuse the same code path as for asynchronous
|
||||
* requests which means that ub_resolve_async is used under the
|
||||
* hood instead of ub_resolve.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we would simply accept the facts that side effects will
|
||||
* happen, we could greatly simplify this code and have the
|
||||
* same code path (for scheduling the request and the timeout)
|
||||
* for both synchronous and asynchronous requests.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We should ask ourself: How likely is it that an user that
|
||||
* uses asynchronous queries would do a synchronous query, that
|
||||
* should block all async activity, in between? Is
|
||||
* anticipating this behaviour (in which we only partly succeed
|
||||
* to begin with) worth the complexity of divergent code paths?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
GETDNS_SCHEDULE_EVENT(
|
||||
dnsreq->loop, netreq->upstream->fd, /*dnsreq->context->timeout,*/
|
||||
(transport == GETDNS_TRANSPORT_TLS ?
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue